Squashed 'littlefs/' changes from c733d9e..3513ff1

3513ff1 Merge pull request #911 from littlefs-project/fix-release-structs
8a22bd6 Merge pull request #910 from littlefs-project/fix-superblock-expansion-thresh
9b82db7 Merge pull request #898 from zchen24/patch-1
99b84ee Update DESIGN.md, fix minor typo
e91a29d Fixed struct sizes missing from generated release notes
b9b95ab Increase threshold for superblock expansion from ~50% -> ~88% full
10bcff1 Update DESIGN.md minor typo

git-subtree-dir: littlefs
git-subtree-split: 3513ff1afc1d67adb2e6f492f0b9bc0d798fcb0d

.github/workflows/release.yml

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ jobs:
             table[$i,$j]=$c_camel
             ((j+=1))
 
-            for s in code stack struct
+            for s in code stack structs
             do
               f=sizes/thumb${c:+-$c}.$s.csv
               [ -e $f ] && table[$i,$j]=$( \

DESIGN.md

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ This leaves us with three major requirements for an embedded filesystem.
    RAM to temporarily store filesystem metadata.
 
    For ROM, this means we need to keep our design simple and reuse code paths
-   were possible. For RAM we have a stronger requirement, all RAM usage is
+   where possible. For RAM we have a stronger requirement, all RAM usage is
    bounded. This means RAM usage does not grow as the filesystem changes in
    size or number of files. This creates a unique challenge as even presumably
    simple operations, such as traversing the filesystem, become surprisingly
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ log₂_n_ pointers that skip to different preceding elements of the
 skip-list.
 
 The name comes from heavy use of the [CTZ instruction][wikipedia-ctz], which
-lets us calculate the power-of-two factors efficiently. For a give block _n_,
+lets us calculate the power-of-two factors efficiently. For a given block _n_,
 that block contains ctz(_n_)+1 pointers.
 
 ```

lfs.c

@@ -2151,9 +2151,11 @@ static int lfs_dir_splittingcompact(lfs_t *lfs, lfs_mdir_t *dir,
             return size;
         }
 
-        // do we have extra space? littlefs can't reclaim this space
-        // by itself, so expand cautiously
-        if ((lfs_size_t)size < lfs->block_count/2) {
+        // littlefs cannot reclaim expanded superblocks, so expand cautiously
+        //
+        // if our filesystem is more than ~88% full, don't expand, this is
+        // somewhat arbitrary
+        if (lfs->block_count - size > lfs->block_count/8) {
             LFS_DEBUG("Expanding superblock at rev %"PRIu32, dir->rev);
             int err = lfs_dir_split(lfs, dir, attrs, attrcount,
                     source, begin, end);