-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use dedicated string attribute for string literals #374
Comments
bcardosolopes
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 29, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this issue
Mar 24, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in llvm#374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in llvm#374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this issue
Mar 24, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in llvm#374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in llvm#374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in llvm#374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in llvm#374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
bruteforceboy
pushed a commit
to bruteforceboy/clangir
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in llvm#374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in llvm#374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
Hugobros3
pushed a commit
to shady-gang/clangir
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in llvm#374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in llvm#374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
keryell
pushed a commit
to keryell/clangir
that referenced
this issue
Oct 19, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in llvm#374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in llvm#374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2024
This commit supports the codegen of wide string literals, including `wchar_t` string literals, `char16_t` string literals, and `char32_t` string literals. I'm not following the proposal in #374. The clang frontend doesn't record the literal string. It only records the encoded code units for wide string literals. So I believe that a dedicated string attribute with an encoding tag as described in #374 may not be that helpful as I thought.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently C/C++ string literals are lowered to a
#cir.const_array
with a built-inmlir::StringAttr
that holds the constant string value. However, the built-inmlir::StringAttr
does not hold the character set of the string literal (i.e. onlychar
strings andchar8_t
strings are supported now).We can introduce a new attribute
#cir.string
that holds the string literal value together with its character set information (char
andchar8_t
,wchar_t
,char16_t
,char32_t
). Based on the new attribute we can support wide string literals (wchar_t
string), UTF-16 string literals (char16_t
string), and UTF-32 string literals (char32_t
string).I'd love to help draft a PR for this if this is necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: