Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] No RISC-V Store clustering #84449

Open
zxc12523 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Question] No RISC-V Store clustering #84449

zxc12523 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
backend:RISC-V question A question, not bug report. Check out https://llvm.org/docs/GettingInvolved.html instead!

Comments

@zxc12523
Copy link
Contributor

zxc12523 commented Mar 8, 2024

if (EnableMISchedLoadClustering) {

Hello developers,
I went through the RISCVTargetMachine.cpp and only found that there is only EnableMISchedLoadClustering option in this file .
I wonder if it is possible to enable store clustering also, or is there any special reason to not enable it?
Thx

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw added question A question, not bug report. Check out https://llvm.org/docs/GettingInvolved.html instead! backend:RISC-V and removed new issue labels Mar 8, 2024
@dtcxzyw
Copy link
Member

dtcxzyw commented Mar 8, 2024

Related PR: #73796

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Mar 8, 2024

@llvm/issue-subscribers-backend-risc-v

Author: None (zxc12523)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/881df557501d339c7a14b16d68e43da5c732b424/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetMachine.cpp#L344

Hello developers,
I went through the RISCVTargetMachine.cpp and only found that there is only EnableMISchedLoadClustering option in this file .
I wonder if it is possible to enable store clustering also, or is there any special reason to not enable it?
Thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend:RISC-V question A question, not bug report. Check out https://llvm.org/docs/GettingInvolved.html instead!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants