-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LSR] Fix matching vscale immediates #100080
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Benjamin Maxwell (MacDue) ChangesSomewhat confusingly a This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100080.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
index 11f9f7822a15c..3ba56a1a3af9d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
@@ -947,7 +947,8 @@ static Immediate ExtractImmediate(const SCEV *&S, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
return Result;
} else if (EnableVScaleImmediates)
- if (const SCEVMulExpr *M = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S))
+ if (const SCEVMulExpr *M = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S);
+ M && M->getNumOperands() == 2)
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(M->getOperand(0)))
if (isa<SCEVVScale>(M->getOperand(1))) {
S = SE.getConstant(M->getType(), 0);
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/AArch64/vscale-fixups.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/AArch64/vscale-fixups.ll
index 483955c1c57a0..588696d20227f 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/AArch64/vscale-fixups.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/AArch64/vscale-fixups.ll
@@ -384,4 +384,55 @@ for.exit:
ret void
}
+;; Here are two writes that should be `16 * vscale * vscale` apart, so MUL VL
+;; addressing cannot be used to offset the second write, as for example,
+;; `#4, mul vl` would only be an offset of `16 * vscale` (dropping a vscale).
+define void @vscale_squared_offset(ptr %alloc) #0 {
+; COMMON-LABEL: vscale_squared_offset:
+; COMMON: // %bb.0: // %entry
+; COMMON-NEXT: rdvl x9, #1
+; COMMON-NEXT: fmov z0.s, #4.00000000
+; COMMON-NEXT: mov x8, xzr
+; COMMON-NEXT: lsr x9, x9, #4
+; COMMON-NEXT: fmov z1.s, #8.00000000
+; COMMON-NEXT: cntw x10
+; COMMON-NEXT: ptrue p0.s, vl1
+; COMMON-NEXT: umull x9, w9, w9
+; COMMON-NEXT: lsl x9, x9, #6
+; COMMON-NEXT: cmp x8, x10
+; COMMON-NEXT: b.ge .LBB6_2
+; COMMON-NEXT: .LBB6_1: // %for.body
+; COMMON-NEXT: // =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; COMMON-NEXT: add x11, x0, x9
+; COMMON-NEXT: st1w { z0.s }, p0, [x0]
+; COMMON-NEXT: add x8, x8, #1
+; COMMON-NEXT: st1w { z1.s }, p0, [x11]
+; COMMON-NEXT: addvl x0, x0, #1
+; COMMON-NEXT: cmp x8, x10
+; COMMON-NEXT: b.lt .LBB6_1
+; COMMON-NEXT: .LBB6_2: // %for.exit
+; COMMON-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %vscale = call i64 @llvm.vscale.i64()
+ %c4_vscale = mul i64 %vscale, 4
+ br label %for.check
+for.check:
+ %i = phi i64 [ %next_i, %for.body ], [ 0, %entry ]
+ %is_lt = icmp slt i64 %i, %c4_vscale
+ br i1 %is_lt, label %for.body, label %for.exit
+for.body:
+ %mask = call <vscale x 4 x i1> @llvm.aarch64.sve.whilelt.nxv4i1.i64(i64 0, i64 1)
+ %upper_offset = mul i64 %i, %c4_vscale
+ %upper_ptr = getelementptr float, ptr %alloc, i64 %upper_offset
+ call void @llvm.masked.store.nxv4f32.p0(<vscale x 4 x float> shufflevector (<vscale x 4 x float> insertelement (<vscale x 4 x float> poison, float 4.000000e+00, i64 0), <vscale x 4 x float> poison, <vscale x 4 x i32> zeroinitializer), ptr %upper_ptr, i32 4, <vscale x 4 x i1> %mask)
+ %lower_i = add i64 %i, %c4_vscale
+ %lower_offset = mul i64 %lower_i, %c4_vscale
+ %lower_ptr = getelementptr float, ptr %alloc, i64 %lower_offset
+ call void @llvm.masked.store.nxv4f32.p0(<vscale x 4 x float> shufflevector (<vscale x 4 x float> insertelement (<vscale x 4 x float> poison, float 8.000000e+00, i64 0), <vscale x 4 x float> poison, <vscale x 4 x i32> zeroinitializer), ptr %lower_ptr, i32 4, <vscale x 4 x i1> %mask)
+ %next_i = add i64 %i, 1
+ br label %for.check
+for.exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+sve2" vscale_range(1,16) }
|
Note: The pre-commit Precommit vscale-fixups.ll test shows the current (incorrect) codegen. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Somewhat confusingly a `SCEVMulExpr` is a `SCEVNAryExpr`, so can have > 2 operands. Previously, the vscale immediate matching did not check the number of operands of the `SCEVMulExpr`, so would ignore any operands after the first two. This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a `vscale * vscale` multiple away. The test added with this change shows an example reduced from IREE. The second write should be offset from the first `16 * vscale * vscale` (* 4 bytes), however, previously LSR dropped the second vscale and instead offset the write by `llvm#4, mul vl`, which is an offset of `16 * vscale` (* 4 bytes).
Precommit test for llvm#100080.
Precommit test for llvm#100080.
Precommit test for llvm#100080. (cherry picked from commit c1b70fa)
Somewhat confusingly a `SCEVMulExpr` is a `SCEVNAryExpr`, so can have > 2 operands. Previously, the vscale immediate matching did not check the number of operands of the `SCEVMulExpr`, so would ignore any operands after the first two. This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a `vscale * vscale` multiple away. The test added with this change shows an example reduced from IREE. The second write should be offset from the first `16 * vscale * vscale` (* 4 bytes), however, previously LSR dropped the second vscale and instead offset the write by `#4, mul vl`, which is an offset of `16 * vscale` (* 4 bytes). (cherry picked from commit 7fad04e)
/pull-request #100359 |
Precommit test for llvm#100080. (cherry picked from commit c1b70fa)
Somewhat confusingly a `SCEVMulExpr` is a `SCEVNAryExpr`, so can have > 2 operands. Previously, the vscale immediate matching did not check the number of operands of the `SCEVMulExpr`, so would ignore any operands after the first two. This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a `vscale * vscale` multiple away. The test added with this change shows an example reduced from IREE. The second write should be offset from the first `16 * vscale * vscale` (* 4 bytes), however, previously LSR dropped the second vscale and instead offset the write by `#4, mul vl`, which is an offset of `16 * vscale` (* 4 bytes). (cherry picked from commit 7fad04e)
Summary: Precommit test for #100080. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: https://phabricator.intern.facebook.com/D60251062
Summary: Somewhat confusingly a `SCEVMulExpr` is a `SCEVNAryExpr`, so can have > 2 operands. Previously, the vscale immediate matching did not check the number of operands of the `SCEVMulExpr`, so would ignore any operands after the first two. This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a `vscale * vscale` multiple away. The test added with this change shows an example reduced from IREE. The second write should be offset from the first `16 * vscale * vscale` (* 4 bytes), however, previously LSR dropped the second vscale and instead offset the write by `#4, mul vl`, which is an offset of `16 * vscale` (* 4 bytes). Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: https://phabricator.intern.facebook.com/D60250721
Somewhat confusingly a `SCEVMulExpr` is a `SCEVNAryExpr`, so can have > 2 operands. Previously, the vscale immediate matching did not check the number of operands of the `SCEVMulExpr`, so would ignore any operands after the first two. This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a `vscale * vscale` multiple away. The test added with this change shows an example reduced from IREE. The second write should be offset from the first `16 * vscale * vscale` (* 4 bytes), however, previously LSR dropped the second vscale and instead offset the write by `llvm#4, mul vl`, which is an offset of `16 * vscale` (* 4 bytes).
Somewhat confusingly a
SCEVMulExpr
is aSCEVNAryExpr
, so can have > 2 operands. Previously, the vscale immediate matching did not check the number of operands of theSCEVMulExpr
, so would ignore any operands after the first two.This led to incorrect codegen (and results) for ArmSME in IREE (https://github.com/iree-org/iree), which sometimes addresses things that are a
vscale * vscale
multiple away. The test added with this change shows an example reduced from IREE. The second write should be offset from the first16 * vscale * vscale
(* 4 bytes), however, previously LSR dropped the second vscale and instead offset the write by#4, mul vl
, which is an offset of16 * vscale
(* 4 bytes).