-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Coverage] Introduce "partial fold" on BranchRegion #112694
Conversation
Currently both True/False counts were folded. It lost the information, "It is True or False before folding." It prevented recalling branch counts in merging template instantiations. In `llvm-cov`, a folded branch is shown as: - `[True: n, Folded]` - `[Folded, False n]` In the case If `n` is zero, a branch is reported as "uncovered". This is distinguished from "folded" branch. When folded branches are merged, `Folded` may be dissolved. In the coverage map, either `Counter` is `Zero`. Currently both were `Zero`. Since "partial fold" has been introduced, either case in `switch` is omitted as `Folded`. Each `case:` in `switch` is reported as `[True: n, Folded]`, since `False` count doesn't show meaningful value. When `switch` doesn't have `default:`, `switch (Cond)` is reported as `[Folded, False: n]`, since `True` count was just the sum of `case`(s). `switch` with `default` can be considered as "the statement that doesn't have any `False`(s)".
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen Author: NAKAMURA Takumi (chapuni) ChangesCurrently both True/False counts were folded. It lost the information, "It is True or False before folding." It prevented recalling branch counts in merging template instantiations. In
In the case If In the coverage map, either Since "partial fold" has been introduced, either case in Each When Patch is 45.48 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112694.diff 16 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
index 07015834bc84f3..a9a3eb91a6af27 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
@@ -1098,12 +1098,6 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return ExitCount;
}
- /// Determine whether the given condition can be constant folded.
- bool ConditionFoldsToBool(const Expr *Cond) {
- Expr::EvalResult Result;
- return (Cond->EvaluateAsInt(Result, CVM.getCodeGenModule().getContext()));
- }
-
/// Create a Branch Region around an instrumentable condition for coverage
/// and add it to the function's SourceRegions. A branch region tracks a
/// "True" counter and a "False" counter for boolean expressions that
@@ -1133,13 +1127,15 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
// Alternatively, we can prevent any optimization done via
// constant-folding by ensuring that ConstantFoldsToSimpleInteger() in
// CodeGenFunction.c always returns false, but that is very heavy-handed.
- if (ConditionFoldsToBool(C))
- popRegions(pushRegion(Counter::getZero(), getStart(C), getEnd(C),
- Counter::getZero(), BranchParams));
- else
- // Otherwise, create a region with the True counter and False counter.
- popRegions(pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(C), getEnd(C), FalseCnt,
- BranchParams));
+ Expr::EvalResult Result;
+ if (C->EvaluateAsInt(Result, CVM.getCodeGenModule().getContext())) {
+ if (Result.Val.getInt().getBoolValue())
+ FalseCnt = Counter::getZero();
+ else
+ TrueCnt = Counter::getZero();
+ }
+ popRegions(
+ pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(C), getEnd(C), FalseCnt, BranchParams));
}
}
@@ -1153,12 +1149,12 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
/// Create a Branch Region around a SwitchCase for code coverage
/// and add it to the function's SourceRegions.
- void createSwitchCaseRegion(const SwitchCase *SC, Counter TrueCnt,
- Counter FalseCnt) {
+ void createSwitchCaseRegion(const SwitchCase *SC, Counter TrueCnt) {
// Push region onto RegionStack but immediately pop it (which adds it to
// the function's SourceRegions) because it doesn't apply to any other
// source other than the SwitchCase.
- popRegions(pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(SC), SC->getColonLoc(), FalseCnt));
+ popRegions(pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(SC), SC->getColonLoc(),
+ Counter::getZero()));
}
/// Check whether a region with bounds \c StartLoc and \c EndLoc
@@ -1870,24 +1866,16 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
const SwitchCase *Case = S->getSwitchCaseList();
for (; Case; Case = Case->getNextSwitchCase()) {
HasDefaultCase = HasDefaultCase || isa<DefaultStmt>(Case);
- CaseCountSum =
- addCounters(CaseCountSum, getRegionCounter(Case), /*Simplify=*/false);
- createSwitchCaseRegion(
- Case, getRegionCounter(Case),
- subtractCounters(ParentCount, getRegionCounter(Case)));
+ auto CaseCount = getRegionCounter(Case);
+ CaseCountSum = addCounters(CaseCountSum, CaseCount, /*Simplify=*/false);
+ createSwitchCaseRegion(Case, CaseCount);
}
- // Simplify is skipped while building the counters above: it can get really
- // slow on top of switches with thousands of cases. Instead, trigger
- // simplification by adding zero to the last counter.
- CaseCountSum = addCounters(CaseCountSum, Counter::getZero());
-
// If no explicit default case exists, create a branch region to represent
// the hidden branch, which will be added later by the CodeGen. This region
// will be associated with the switch statement's condition.
if (!HasDefaultCase) {
- Counter DefaultTrue = subtractCounters(ParentCount, CaseCountSum);
- Counter DefaultFalse = subtractCounters(ParentCount, DefaultTrue);
- createBranchRegion(S->getCond(), DefaultTrue, DefaultFalse);
+ Counter DefaultCount = subtractCounters(ParentCount, CaseCountSum);
+ createBranchRegion(S->getCond(), Counter::getZero(), DefaultCount);
}
}
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp
index 1e7e32808e8382..a2ac1c1eacd28f 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp
@@ -5,94 +5,94 @@
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_0b:
bool fand_0(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
- return false && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
+ return false && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, (#0 - #1)
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_1b:
bool fand_1(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
return a && true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #1, (#0 - #1)
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = #2, 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_2bb:
bool fand_2(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:25 = M:4, C:3
- return false && a && b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
+ return false && a && b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, (#0 - #3)
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = #4, (#3 - #4)
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:24 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_3bb:
bool fand_3(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:24 = M:4, C:3
return a && true && b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #3, (#0 - #3)
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = #4, 0
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:23 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_4bb:
bool fand_4(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:25 = M:4, C:3
return a && b && false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #3, (#0 - #3)
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:16 = #4, (#3 - #4)
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = 0, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_5b:
bool fand_5(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:23 = M:3, C:2
- return false && true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = 0, 0
+ return false && true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, (#0 - #1)
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = #2, 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_6b:
bool fand_6(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
- return true && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
+ return true && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = #1, 0
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_7b:
bool fand_7(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
return a && false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #1, (#0 - #1)
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_0b:
bool for_0(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
- return true || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
+ return true || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#0 - #1), 0
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_1b:
bool for_1(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
return a || false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #1), #1
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_2bb:
bool for_2(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:24 = M:4, C:3
- return true || a || b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
+ return true || a || b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#0 - #3), 0
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = (#3 - #4), #4
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:23 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_3bb:
bool for_3(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:25 = M:4, C:3
return a || false || b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #3), #3
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, #4
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:24 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_4bb:
bool for_4(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:24 = M:4, C:3
return a || b || true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #3), #3
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:16 = (#3 - #4), #4
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = (#1 - #2), 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_5b:
bool for_5(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:23 = M:3, C:2
- return true || false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = 0, 0
+ return true || false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#0 - #1), 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = 0, #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_6b:
bool for_6(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
- return false || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
+ return false || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, #1
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_7b:
bool for_7(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
return a || true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #1), #1
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = (#1 - #2), 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_8b:
bool for_8(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+3]]:7 -> [[@LINE+3]]:20 = M:3, C:2
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:7 -> [[@LINE+2]]:11 = 0, 0
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:15 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:7 -> [[@LINE+2]]:11 = #2, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:15 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = 0, (#2 - #3)
if (true && false)
return true;
else
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp
index 445cdfc20e2aff..b6fd525e930f90 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ struct S {
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z3foov:
// CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE+3]]:12 -> [[@LINE+8]]:2 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE+3]]:15 -> [[@LINE+3]]:19 = #0
- // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:15 -> [[@LINE+2]]:19 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:15 -> [[@LINE+2]]:19 = #2, 0
void foo() { // CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:21 -> [[@LINE+1]]:22 = #2
if (int j = true ? nop() // CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE]]:22 -> [[@LINE]]:27 = #2
: nop(); // CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE]]:22 -> [[@LINE]]:27 = (#0 - #2)
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int main() { // CHECK: File 0, [[@LINE]]:12 -> {{[0-9]+}}:2 =
// GH-45481
S s;
s.the_prop = 0? 1 : 2; // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:16 -> [[@LINE]]:17 = #0
- // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:16 -> [[@LINE-1]]:17 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:16 -> [[@LINE-1]]:17 = 0, (#0 - #7)
// CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:18 -> [[@LINE-2]]:19 = #7
// CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE-3]]:19 -> [[@LINE-3]]:20 = #7
// CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE-4]]:23 -> [[@LINE-4]]:24 = (#0 - #7)
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c
index ad71fb15eda423..4cd2c934371931 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c
@@ -4,29 +4,29 @@
// CHECK: File 1, [[@LINE+7]]:12 -> [[@LINE+7]]:38 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+6]]:15 -> [[@LINE+6]]:28 = (#0 + #2)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+5]]:21 -> [[@LINE+5]]:22 = (#0 + #2)
-// CHECK: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+4]]:21 -> [[@LINE+4]]:22 = 0, 0
+// CHECK: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+4]]:21 -> [[@LINE+4]]:22 = 0, ((#0 + #2) - #3)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+3]]:24 -> [[@LINE+3]]:26 = #3
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+2]]:36 -> [[@LINE+2]]:37 = (#0 + #2)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, #0
#define M1 do { if (0) {} } while (0)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+12]]:15 -> [[@LINE+12]]:41 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+11]]:18 -> [[@LINE+11]]:31 = (#0 + #4)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+10]]:24 -> [[@LINE+10]]:25 = (#0 + #4)
// CHECK: File 2, [[@LINE+9]]:27 -> [[@LINE+9]]:29 = #5
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+8]]:39 -> [[@LINE+8]]:40 = (#0 + #4)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 2, [[@LINE+7]]:39 -> [[@LINE+7]]:40 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 2, [[@LINE+7]]:39 -> [[@LINE+7]]:40 = 0, #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+6]]:15 -> [[@LINE+6]]:41 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+5]]:18 -> [[@LINE+5]]:31 = (#0 + #6)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+4]]:24 -> [[@LINE+4]]:25 = (#0 + #6)
// CHECK: File 3, [[@LINE+3]]:27 -> [[@LINE+3]]:29 = #7
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+2]]:39 -> [[@LINE+2]]:40 = (#0 + #6)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 3, [[@LINE+1]]:39 -> [[@LINE+1]]:40 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 3, [[@LINE+1]]:39 -> [[@LINE+1]]:40 = 0, #0
#define M2(x) do { if (x) {} } while (0)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 4, [[@LINE+5]]:15 -> [[@LINE+5]]:38 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 4, [[@LINE+4]]:18 -> [[@LINE+4]]:28 = (#0 + #8)
// CHECK-NEXT: Expansion,File 4, [[@LINE+3]]:20 -> [[@LINE+3]]:22 = (#0 + #8)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 4, [[@LINE+2]]:36 -> [[@LINE+2]]:37 = (#0 + #8)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 4, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 4, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, #0
#define M3(x) do { M2(x); } while (0)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 5, [[@LINE+4]]:15 -> [[@LINE+4]]:27 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 5, [[@LINE+3]]:16 -> [[@LINE+3]]:19 = #0
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c
index a263e9b688faed..60e456948a5182 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
// CHECK: builtin_macro0:
int builtin_macro0(int a) {
// CHECK: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+2]]:15 = M:3, C:2
- return (__LINE__ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
+ return (__LINE__ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #1, 0 [1,2,0]
&& a); // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:14 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = #2, (#1 - #2) [2,0,0]
}
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int builtin_macro0(int a) {
int builtin_macro1(int a) {
// CHECK: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+2]]:22 = M:3, C:2
return (a // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:12 = (#0 - #1), #1 [1,0,2]
- || __LINE__); // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:14 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0 [2,0,0]
+ || __LINE__); // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:14 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#1 - #2), 0 [2,0,0]
}
#define PRE(x) pre_##x
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp
index ae26ed5fe469f2..cb1c8743c36e82 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp
@@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
int func0(int a) {
// CHECK: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+3]]:11 -> [[@LINE+3]]:21 = M:3, C:2
// W_SYS: Expansion,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:11 -> [[@LINE+2]]:16 = #0 (Expanded file = 1)
- // X_SYS: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+1]]:11 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
+ // X_SYS: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+1]]:11 = #1, 0 [1,2,0]
return (CONST && a);
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:20 -> [[@LINE-1]]:21 = #2, (#1 - #2) [2,0,0]
- // W_SYS: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE-16]]:15 -> [[@LINE-16]]:17 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
+ // W_SYS: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE-16]]:15 -> [[@LINE-16]]:17 = #1, 0 [1,2,0]
}
// CHECK: _Z5func1ii:
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp
index b47c0e80099527..a1fee644faaf0e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
// CHECK: foo
void foo(int i) { // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:17 -> [[@LINE+11]]:2 = #0
- switch(i) { // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = ((#0 - #2) - #3), (#2 + #3)
+ switch(i) { // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = 0, ((#0 - #2) - #3)
// CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:13 -> [[@LINE+5]]:10 = 0
case 1: // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:11 = #2
- return; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #2, (#0 - #2)
+ return; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #2, 0
// CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:12 -> [[@LINE+1]]:3 = 0
case 2: // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:10 = #3
- break; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #3, (#0 - #3)
+ break; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #3, 0
} // CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE]]:4 -> [[@LINE+1]]:3 = #1
int x = 0; // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:2 = #1
@@ -18,24 +18,24 @@ int nop() { return 0; }
// CHECK: bar
void bar(int i) { // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:17 -> [[@LINE+21]]:2 = #0
- switch (i) // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:12 = #0, 0
+ switch (i) //...
[truncated]
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-pgo Author: NAKAMURA Takumi (chapuni) ChangesCurrently both True/False counts were folded. It lost the information, "It is True or False before folding." It prevented recalling branch counts in merging template instantiations. In
In the case If In the coverage map, either Since "partial fold" has been introduced, either case in Each When Patch is 45.48 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112694.diff 16 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
index 07015834bc84f3..a9a3eb91a6af27 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
@@ -1098,12 +1098,6 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return ExitCount;
}
- /// Determine whether the given condition can be constant folded.
- bool ConditionFoldsToBool(const Expr *Cond) {
- Expr::EvalResult Result;
- return (Cond->EvaluateAsInt(Result, CVM.getCodeGenModule().getContext()));
- }
-
/// Create a Branch Region around an instrumentable condition for coverage
/// and add it to the function's SourceRegions. A branch region tracks a
/// "True" counter and a "False" counter for boolean expressions that
@@ -1133,13 +1127,15 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
// Alternatively, we can prevent any optimization done via
// constant-folding by ensuring that ConstantFoldsToSimpleInteger() in
// CodeGenFunction.c always returns false, but that is very heavy-handed.
- if (ConditionFoldsToBool(C))
- popRegions(pushRegion(Counter::getZero(), getStart(C), getEnd(C),
- Counter::getZero(), BranchParams));
- else
- // Otherwise, create a region with the True counter and False counter.
- popRegions(pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(C), getEnd(C), FalseCnt,
- BranchParams));
+ Expr::EvalResult Result;
+ if (C->EvaluateAsInt(Result, CVM.getCodeGenModule().getContext())) {
+ if (Result.Val.getInt().getBoolValue())
+ FalseCnt = Counter::getZero();
+ else
+ TrueCnt = Counter::getZero();
+ }
+ popRegions(
+ pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(C), getEnd(C), FalseCnt, BranchParams));
}
}
@@ -1153,12 +1149,12 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
/// Create a Branch Region around a SwitchCase for code coverage
/// and add it to the function's SourceRegions.
- void createSwitchCaseRegion(const SwitchCase *SC, Counter TrueCnt,
- Counter FalseCnt) {
+ void createSwitchCaseRegion(const SwitchCase *SC, Counter TrueCnt) {
// Push region onto RegionStack but immediately pop it (which adds it to
// the function's SourceRegions) because it doesn't apply to any other
// source other than the SwitchCase.
- popRegions(pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(SC), SC->getColonLoc(), FalseCnt));
+ popRegions(pushRegion(TrueCnt, getStart(SC), SC->getColonLoc(),
+ Counter::getZero()));
}
/// Check whether a region with bounds \c StartLoc and \c EndLoc
@@ -1870,24 +1866,16 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
const SwitchCase *Case = S->getSwitchCaseList();
for (; Case; Case = Case->getNextSwitchCase()) {
HasDefaultCase = HasDefaultCase || isa<DefaultStmt>(Case);
- CaseCountSum =
- addCounters(CaseCountSum, getRegionCounter(Case), /*Simplify=*/false);
- createSwitchCaseRegion(
- Case, getRegionCounter(Case),
- subtractCounters(ParentCount, getRegionCounter(Case)));
+ auto CaseCount = getRegionCounter(Case);
+ CaseCountSum = addCounters(CaseCountSum, CaseCount, /*Simplify=*/false);
+ createSwitchCaseRegion(Case, CaseCount);
}
- // Simplify is skipped while building the counters above: it can get really
- // slow on top of switches with thousands of cases. Instead, trigger
- // simplification by adding zero to the last counter.
- CaseCountSum = addCounters(CaseCountSum, Counter::getZero());
-
// If no explicit default case exists, create a branch region to represent
// the hidden branch, which will be added later by the CodeGen. This region
// will be associated with the switch statement's condition.
if (!HasDefaultCase) {
- Counter DefaultTrue = subtractCounters(ParentCount, CaseCountSum);
- Counter DefaultFalse = subtractCounters(ParentCount, DefaultTrue);
- createBranchRegion(S->getCond(), DefaultTrue, DefaultFalse);
+ Counter DefaultCount = subtractCounters(ParentCount, CaseCountSum);
+ createBranchRegion(S->getCond(), Counter::getZero(), DefaultCount);
}
}
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp
index 1e7e32808e8382..a2ac1c1eacd28f 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/branch-constfolded.cpp
@@ -5,94 +5,94 @@
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_0b:
bool fand_0(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
- return false && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
+ return false && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, (#0 - #1)
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_1b:
bool fand_1(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
return a && true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #1, (#0 - #1)
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = #2, 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_2bb:
bool fand_2(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:25 = M:4, C:3
- return false && a && b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
+ return false && a && b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, (#0 - #3)
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = #4, (#3 - #4)
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:24 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_3bb:
bool fand_3(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:24 = M:4, C:3
return a && true && b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #3, (#0 - #3)
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = #4, 0
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:23 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_4bb:
bool fand_4(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:25 = M:4, C:3
return a && b && false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #3, (#0 - #3)
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:16 = #4, (#3 - #4)
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = 0, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_5b:
bool fand_5(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:23 = M:3, C:2
- return false && true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = 0, 0
+ return false && true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, (#0 - #1)
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = #2, 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_6b:
bool fand_6(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
- return true && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
+ return true && a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = #1, 0
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = #2, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z6fand_7b:
bool fand_7(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
return a && false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #1, (#0 - #1)
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, (#1 - #2)
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_0b:
bool for_0(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
- return true || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
+ return true || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#0 - #1), 0
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_1b:
bool for_1(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
return a || false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #1), #1
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_2bb:
bool for_2(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:24 = M:4, C:3
- return true || a || b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
+ return true || a || b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#0 - #3), 0
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = (#3 - #4), #4
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:23 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_3bb:
bool for_3(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:25 = M:4, C:3
return a || false || b; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #3), #3
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = 0, #4
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:24 -> [[@LINE-2]]:25 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_4bb:
bool for_4(bool a, bool b) {// MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:24 = M:4, C:3
return a || b || true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #3), #3
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:16 = (#3 - #4), #4
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:20 -> [[@LINE-2]]:24 = (#1 - #2), 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_5b:
bool for_5(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:23 = M:3, C:2
- return true || false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = 0, 0
+ return true || false; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#0 - #1), 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:18 -> [[@LINE-1]]:23 = 0, #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_6b:
bool for_6(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = M:3, C:2
- return false || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, 0
+ return false || a; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = 0, #1
} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:19 -> [[@LINE-1]]:20 = (#1 - #2), #2
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_7b:
bool for_7(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:10 -> [[@LINE+1]]:19 = M:3, C:2
return a || true; // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = (#0 - #1), #1
-} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = 0, 0
+} // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:15 -> [[@LINE-1]]:19 = (#1 - #2), 0
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z5for_8b:
bool for_8(bool a) { // MCDC: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+3]]:7 -> [[@LINE+3]]:20 = M:3, C:2
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:7 -> [[@LINE+2]]:11 = 0, 0
- // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:15 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:7 -> [[@LINE+2]]:11 = #2, 0
+ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:15 -> [[@LINE+1]]:20 = 0, (#2 - #3)
if (true && false)
return true;
else
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp
index 445cdfc20e2aff..b6fd525e930f90 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/if.cpp
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ struct S {
// CHECK-LABEL: _Z3foov:
// CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE+3]]:12 -> [[@LINE+8]]:2 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE+3]]:15 -> [[@LINE+3]]:19 = #0
- // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:15 -> [[@LINE+2]]:19 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:15 -> [[@LINE+2]]:19 = #2, 0
void foo() { // CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:21 -> [[@LINE+1]]:22 = #2
if (int j = true ? nop() // CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE]]:22 -> [[@LINE]]:27 = #2
: nop(); // CHECK-NEXT: [[@LINE]]:22 -> [[@LINE]]:27 = (#0 - #2)
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int main() { // CHECK: File 0, [[@LINE]]:12 -> {{[0-9]+}}:2 =
// GH-45481
S s;
s.the_prop = 0? 1 : 2; // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:16 -> [[@LINE]]:17 = #0
- // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:16 -> [[@LINE-1]]:17 = 0, 0
+ // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:16 -> [[@LINE-1]]:17 = 0, (#0 - #7)
// CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE-2]]:18 -> [[@LINE-2]]:19 = #7
// CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE-3]]:19 -> [[@LINE-3]]:20 = #7
// CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE-4]]:23 -> [[@LINE-4]]:24 = (#0 - #7)
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c
index ad71fb15eda423..4cd2c934371931 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/macro-expansion.c
@@ -4,29 +4,29 @@
// CHECK: File 1, [[@LINE+7]]:12 -> [[@LINE+7]]:38 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+6]]:15 -> [[@LINE+6]]:28 = (#0 + #2)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+5]]:21 -> [[@LINE+5]]:22 = (#0 + #2)
-// CHECK: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+4]]:21 -> [[@LINE+4]]:22 = 0, 0
+// CHECK: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+4]]:21 -> [[@LINE+4]]:22 = 0, ((#0 + #2) - #3)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+3]]:24 -> [[@LINE+3]]:26 = #3
// CHECK-NEXT: File 1, [[@LINE+2]]:36 -> [[@LINE+2]]:37 = (#0 + #2)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, #0
#define M1 do { if (0) {} } while (0)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+12]]:15 -> [[@LINE+12]]:41 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+11]]:18 -> [[@LINE+11]]:31 = (#0 + #4)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+10]]:24 -> [[@LINE+10]]:25 = (#0 + #4)
// CHECK: File 2, [[@LINE+9]]:27 -> [[@LINE+9]]:29 = #5
// CHECK-NEXT: File 2, [[@LINE+8]]:39 -> [[@LINE+8]]:40 = (#0 + #4)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 2, [[@LINE+7]]:39 -> [[@LINE+7]]:40 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 2, [[@LINE+7]]:39 -> [[@LINE+7]]:40 = 0, #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+6]]:15 -> [[@LINE+6]]:41 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+5]]:18 -> [[@LINE+5]]:31 = (#0 + #6)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+4]]:24 -> [[@LINE+4]]:25 = (#0 + #6)
// CHECK: File 3, [[@LINE+3]]:27 -> [[@LINE+3]]:29 = #7
// CHECK-NEXT: File 3, [[@LINE+2]]:39 -> [[@LINE+2]]:40 = (#0 + #6)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 3, [[@LINE+1]]:39 -> [[@LINE+1]]:40 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 3, [[@LINE+1]]:39 -> [[@LINE+1]]:40 = 0, #0
#define M2(x) do { if (x) {} } while (0)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 4, [[@LINE+5]]:15 -> [[@LINE+5]]:38 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 4, [[@LINE+4]]:18 -> [[@LINE+4]]:28 = (#0 + #8)
// CHECK-NEXT: Expansion,File 4, [[@LINE+3]]:20 -> [[@LINE+3]]:22 = (#0 + #8)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 4, [[@LINE+2]]:36 -> [[@LINE+2]]:37 = (#0 + #8)
-// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 4, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, 0
+// CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 4, [[@LINE+1]]:36 -> [[@LINE+1]]:37 = 0, #0
#define M3(x) do { M2(x); } while (0)
// CHECK-NEXT: File 5, [[@LINE+4]]:15 -> [[@LINE+4]]:27 = #0
// CHECK-NEXT: File 5, [[@LINE+3]]:16 -> [[@LINE+3]]:19 = #0
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c
index a263e9b688faed..60e456948a5182 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-scratch-space.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
// CHECK: builtin_macro0:
int builtin_macro0(int a) {
// CHECK: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+2]]:15 = M:3, C:2
- return (__LINE__ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
+ return (__LINE__ // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = #1, 0 [1,2,0]
&& a); // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:14 -> [[@LINE]]:15 = #2, (#1 - #2) [2,0,0]
}
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int builtin_macro0(int a) {
int builtin_macro1(int a) {
// CHECK: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+2]]:22 = M:3, C:2
return (a // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:12 = (#0 - #1), #1 [1,0,2]
- || __LINE__); // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:14 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = 0, 0 [2,0,0]
+ || __LINE__); // CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:14 -> [[@LINE]]:14 = (#1 - #2), 0 [2,0,0]
}
#define PRE(x) pre_##x
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp
index ae26ed5fe469f2..cb1c8743c36e82 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp
@@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
int func0(int a) {
// CHECK: Decision,File 0, [[@LINE+3]]:11 -> [[@LINE+3]]:21 = M:3, C:2
// W_SYS: Expansion,File 0, [[@LINE+2]]:11 -> [[@LINE+2]]:16 = #0 (Expanded file = 1)
- // X_SYS: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+1]]:11 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
+ // X_SYS: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE+1]]:11 -> [[@LINE+1]]:11 = #1, 0 [1,2,0]
return (CONST && a);
// CHECK: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:20 -> [[@LINE-1]]:21 = #2, (#1 - #2) [2,0,0]
- // W_SYS: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE-16]]:15 -> [[@LINE-16]]:17 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
+ // W_SYS: Branch,File 1, [[@LINE-16]]:15 -> [[@LINE-16]]:17 = #1, 0 [1,2,0]
}
// CHECK: _Z5func1ii:
diff --git a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp
index b47c0e80099527..a1fee644faaf0e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
// CHECK: foo
void foo(int i) { // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:17 -> [[@LINE+11]]:2 = #0
- switch(i) { // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = ((#0 - #2) - #3), (#2 + #3)
+ switch(i) { // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:10 -> [[@LINE]]:11 = 0, ((#0 - #2) - #3)
// CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:13 -> [[@LINE+5]]:10 = 0
case 1: // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:11 = #2
- return; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #2, (#0 - #2)
+ return; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #2, 0
// CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:12 -> [[@LINE+1]]:3 = 0
case 2: // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:10 = #3
- break; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #3, (#0 - #3)
+ break; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 -> [[@LINE-1]]:9 = #3, 0
} // CHECK-NEXT: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE]]:4 -> [[@LINE+1]]:3 = #1
int x = 0; // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:2 = #1
@@ -18,24 +18,24 @@ int nop() { return 0; }
// CHECK: bar
void bar(int i) { // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:17 -> [[@LINE+21]]:2 = #0
- switch (i) // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11 -> [[@LINE]]:12 = #0, 0
+ switch (i) //...
[truncated]
|
// constant-folded branch. | ||
if (Region.Count.isZero() && Region.FalseCount.isZero()) | ||
CountedBranchRegions.back().Folded = true; | ||
CountedBranchRegions.back().TrueFolded = Region.Count.isZero(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rename Region.Count to Region.TrueCount?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CounterMappingRegion::Count
is used in non-Branch regions. (then, FalseCount
may be N/A)
Similar cases can be seen in llvm::CountedRegion
and Clang's SourceMappingRegion
. So, I think it'd be our common sense for the region to have FalseCount
optionally.
In contrast, Folded
is specific to Branch region. So, I think TrueFolded
would be less intrusive.
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ json::Array renderRegions(ArrayRef<coverage::CountedRegion> Regions) { | |||
json::Array renderBranchRegions(ArrayRef<coverage::CountedRegion> Regions) { | |||
json::Array RegionArray; | |||
for (const auto &Region : Regions) | |||
if (!Region.Folded) | |||
if (!Region.TrueFolded || !Region.FalseFolded) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
replace with a helper function? e.g. Region.isFolded()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought it would be less valuable, since it looks like CountedRegion
is rather naked. It's clear for me. (Personally I prefer !(TrueFolded && FalseFolded)
than DeMorganized)
That said, I can introduce isBothFolded()
. I hope we wouldn't provide also isTrueFolded()
and isFalseFolded()
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we have to revisit how to show folding. Let me feed this to future tasks.
if (!BR.TrueFolded) { | ||
// "True" Condition Branches. | ||
++NumBranches; | ||
if (BR.ExecutionCount > 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rename ExecutionCount to TrueExecutionCount?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to above, CountedRegion::ExecutionCount
is used generally.
if (BR.ExecutionCount > 0) | ||
++CoveredBranches; | ||
} | ||
if (!BR.FalseFolded) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this be a lambda or static helper function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is enough short with expanded impl.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for comments!
// constant-folded branch. | ||
if (Region.Count.isZero() && Region.FalseCount.isZero()) | ||
CountedBranchRegions.back().Folded = true; | ||
CountedBranchRegions.back().TrueFolded = Region.Count.isZero(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CounterMappingRegion::Count
is used in non-Branch regions. (then, FalseCount
may be N/A)
Similar cases can be seen in llvm::CountedRegion
and Clang's SourceMappingRegion
. So, I think it'd be our common sense for the region to have FalseCount
optionally.
In contrast, Folded
is specific to Branch region. So, I think TrueFolded
would be less intrusive.
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ json::Array renderRegions(ArrayRef<coverage::CountedRegion> Regions) { | |||
json::Array renderBranchRegions(ArrayRef<coverage::CountedRegion> Regions) { | |||
json::Array RegionArray; | |||
for (const auto &Region : Regions) | |||
if (!Region.Folded) | |||
if (!Region.TrueFolded || !Region.FalseFolded) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought it would be less valuable, since it looks like CountedRegion
is rather naked. It's clear for me. (Personally I prefer !(TrueFolded && FalseFolded)
than DeMorganized)
That said, I can introduce isBothFolded()
. I hope we wouldn't provide also isTrueFolded()
and isFalseFolded()
.
if (!BR.TrueFolded) { | ||
// "True" Condition Branches. | ||
++NumBranches; | ||
if (BR.ExecutionCount > 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to above, CountedRegion::ExecutionCount
is used generally.
Do you have example before/after of the change? It's a bit hard to imagine. |
@hanickadot I didn't think there'd be anything to imagine. That said, I will arrange examples later. I still wonder how we could show "partial fold" more clearly and make it more consistent. |
I have no additional list of thing Jessica pointed out, LGTM |
Expr::EvalResult Result; | ||
if (C->EvaluateAsInt(Result, CVM.getCodeGenModule().getContext())) { | ||
if (Result.Val.getInt().getBoolValue()) | ||
FalseCnt = Counter::getZero(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know I got this started by using Counter::getZero()
to represent folded conditions. This decision overloaded the meaning a bit. We may want to consider using a more meaningful region flag or something with room to extend. Though that will impact the region encoding.
I think this is a meaningful enhancement to branch coverage. I don't have much to add to what's been said. LGTM. Thanks! |
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/8580 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
|
Currently both True/False counts were folded. It lost the information, "It is True or False before folding." It prevented recalling branch counts in merging template instantiations. In `llvm-cov`, a folded branch is shown as: - `[True: n, Folded]` - `[Folded, False n]` In the case If `n` is zero, a branch is reported as "uncovered". This is distinguished from "folded" branch. When folded branches are merged, `Folded` may be dissolved. In the coverage map, either `Counter` is `Zero`. Currently both were `Zero`. Since "partial fold" has been introduced, either case in `switch` is omitted as `Folded`. Each `case:` in `switch` is reported as `[True: n, Folded]`, since `False` count doesn't show meaningful value. When `switch` doesn't have `default:`, `switch (Cond)` is reported as `[Folded, False: n]`, since `True` count was just the sum of `case`(s). `switch` with `default` can be considered as "the statement that doesn't have any `False`(s)".
This patch also helps to distinguish constants from rust, in which constant may have only one counter hard coded to Besides, I found that with this change we should also count false counter id when calculating max |
@Lambdaris I have #112730 as well. |
I missed that FalseCnt for each Case was used to calculate percentage in the SwitchStmt. At the moment I resurrect them. In `!HasDefaultCase`, the pair of Counters shall be `[CaseCountSum, FalseCnt]`. (Reversal of before #112694) I think it can be considered as the False count on SwitchStmt. FalseCnt shall be folded (same as current impl) in the coming SingleByteCoverage changes, since percentage would not make sense.
…112694 (#120418) I missed that FalseCnt for each Case was used to calculate percentage in the SwitchStmt. At the moment I resurrect them. In `!HasDefaultCase`, the pair of Counters shall be `[CaseCountSum, FalseCnt]`. (Reversal of before #112694) I think it can be considered as the False count on SwitchStmt. FalseCnt shall be folded (same as current impl) in the coming SingleByteCoverage changes, since percentage would not make sense.
Currently both True/False counts were folded. It lost the information, "It is True or False before folding." It prevented recalling branch counts in merging template instantiations.
In
llvm-cov
, a folded branch is shown as:[True: n, Folded]
[Folded, False n]
In the case If
n
is zero, a branch is reported as "uncovered". This is distinguished from "folded" branch. When folded branches are merged,Folded
may be dissolved.In the coverage map, either
Counter
isZero
. Currently both wereZero
.Since "partial fold" has been introduced, either case in
switch
is omitted asFolded
.Each
case:
inswitch
is reported as[True: n, Folded]
, sinceFalse
count doesn't show meaningful value.When
switch
doesn't havedefault:
,switch (Cond)
is reported as[Folded, False: n]
, sinceTrue
count was just the sum ofcase
(s).switch
withdefault
can be considered as "the statement that doesn't have anyFalse
(s)".