-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Clang] Fix IsOverload for function templates #77323
Conversation
Functions which correspond but have different template parameter lists are not redeclarations. Fixes a regression introduced by af4751 (The patch just moves the template parameters check above if the signature check) Fixes llvm#76358
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin) ChangesFunctions which correspond but have different template parameter lists are not redeclarations. Fixes a regression introduced by af4751 (The patch just moves the template parameters check above if the signature check) Fixes #76358 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77323.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 07da5cb150b467..e6c267bb79e60b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -1259,6 +1259,43 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *New,
if ((OldTemplate == nullptr) != (NewTemplate == nullptr))
return true;
+ if (NewTemplate) {
+ // C++ [temp.over.link]p4:
+ // The signature of a function template consists of its function
+ // signature, its return type and its template parameter list. The names
+ // of the template parameters are significant only for establishing the
+ // relationship between the template parameters and the rest of the
+ // signature.
+ //
+ // We check the return type and template parameter lists for function
+ // templates first; the remaining checks follow.
+ bool SameTemplateParameterList = SemaRef.TemplateParameterListsAreEqual(
+ NewTemplate, NewTemplate->getTemplateParameters(), OldTemplate,
+ OldTemplate->getTemplateParameters(), false, Sema::TPL_TemplateMatch);
+ bool SameReturnType = SemaRef.Context.hasSameType(
+ Old->getDeclaredReturnType(), New->getDeclaredReturnType());
+ // FIXME(GH58571): Match template parameter list even for non-constrained
+ // template heads. This currently ensures that the code prior to C++20 is
+ // not newly broken.
+ bool ConstraintsInTemplateHead =
+ NewTemplate->getTemplateParameters()->hasAssociatedConstraints() ||
+ OldTemplate->getTemplateParameters()->hasAssociatedConstraints();
+ // C++ [namespace.udecl]p11:
+ // The set of declarations named by a using-declarator that inhabits a
+ // class C does not include member functions and member function
+ // templates of a base class that "correspond" to (and thus would
+ // conflict with) a declaration of a function or function template in
+ // C.
+ // Comparing return types is not required for the "correspond" check to
+ // decide whether a member introduced by a shadow declaration is hidden.
+ if (UseMemberUsingDeclRules && ConstraintsInTemplateHead &&
+ !SameTemplateParameterList)
+ return true;
+ if (!UseMemberUsingDeclRules &&
+ (!SameTemplateParameterList || !SameReturnType))
+ return true;
+ }
+
// Is the function New an overload of the function Old?
QualType OldQType = SemaRef.Context.getCanonicalType(Old->getType());
QualType NewQType = SemaRef.Context.getCanonicalType(New->getType());
@@ -1410,43 +1447,6 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *New,
}
}
- if (NewTemplate) {
- // C++ [temp.over.link]p4:
- // The signature of a function template consists of its function
- // signature, its return type and its template parameter list. The names
- // of the template parameters are significant only for establishing the
- // relationship between the template parameters and the rest of the
- // signature.
- //
- // We check the return type and template parameter lists for function
- // templates first; the remaining checks follow.
- bool SameTemplateParameterList = SemaRef.TemplateParameterListsAreEqual(
- NewTemplate, NewTemplate->getTemplateParameters(), OldTemplate,
- OldTemplate->getTemplateParameters(), false, Sema::TPL_TemplateMatch);
- bool SameReturnType = SemaRef.Context.hasSameType(
- Old->getDeclaredReturnType(), New->getDeclaredReturnType());
- // FIXME(GH58571): Match template parameter list even for non-constrained
- // template heads. This currently ensures that the code prior to C++20 is
- // not newly broken.
- bool ConstraintsInTemplateHead =
- NewTemplate->getTemplateParameters()->hasAssociatedConstraints() ||
- OldTemplate->getTemplateParameters()->hasAssociatedConstraints();
- // C++ [namespace.udecl]p11:
- // The set of declarations named by a using-declarator that inhabits a
- // class C does not include member functions and member function
- // templates of a base class that "correspond" to (and thus would
- // conflict with) a declaration of a function or function template in
- // C.
- // Comparing return types is not required for the "correspond" check to
- // decide whether a member introduced by a shadow declaration is hidden.
- if (UseMemberUsingDeclRules && ConstraintsInTemplateHead &&
- !SameTemplateParameterList)
- return true;
- if (!UseMemberUsingDeclRules &&
- (!SameTemplateParameterList || !SameReturnType))
- return true;
- }
-
if (!UseOverrideRules) {
Expr *NewRC = New->getTrailingRequiresClause(),
*OldRC = Old->getTrailingRequiresClause();
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/over/over.load/p2-0x.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/over/over.load/p2-0x.cpp
index 183f3cb322af7e..8fd9a1ce1e87ab 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/over/over.load/p2-0x.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/over/over.load/p2-0x.cpp
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ class Y {
void k() &&; // expected-error{{cannot overload a member function with ref-qualifier '&&' with a member function without a ref-qualifier}}
};
+struct GH76358 {
+ template<int> void f() && {}
+ template<typename T> void f() const {}
+};
+
#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
namespace GH58962 {
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems fine to me, I don't see any reason that anything in the middle would cause a problem, so moving this is fine.
Functions which correspond but have different template parameter lists are not redeclarations. Fixes a regression introduced by af4751 (The patch just moves the template parameters check above if the signature check) Fixes llvm#76358
After Swift PR llvm#77323, we import C++ source locations for imported code. This improves some diagnostics but also breaks some of the heuristics LLDB have to select the right frame on traps. This PR marks the test XFAIL until we figure out a better heuristic to stop at the right frame. This is not a trivial question as we cannot just mark all C++ imported source locations artifical, some of that code is user written, some is not (coming from frameworks, STL). Moreover, some users might prefer to stop in the C++ code and some users might prefer to stop in Swift code.
After Swift PR llvm#77323, we import C++ source locations for imported code. This improves some diagnostics but also breaks some of the heuristics LLDB have to select the right frame on traps. This PR marks the test XFAIL until we figure out a better heuristic to stop at the right frame. This is not a trivial question as we cannot just mark all C++ imported source locations artifical, some of that code is user written, some is not (coming from frameworks, STL). Moreover, some users might prefer to stop in the C++ code and some users might prefer to stop in Swift code.
After Swift PR llvm#77323, we import C++ source locations for imported code. This improves some diagnostics but also breaks some of the heuristics LLDB have to select the right frame on traps. This PR marks the test XFAIL until we figure out a better heuristic to stop at the right frame. This is not a trivial question as we cannot just mark all C++ imported source locations artifical, some of that code is user written, some is not (coming from frameworks, STL). Moreover, some users might prefer to stop in the C++ code and some users might prefer to stop in Swift code. (cherry picked from commit 1c0bdf9)
Functions which correspond but have different template parameter lists are not redeclarations.
Fixes a regression introduced by af4751
(The patch just moves the template parameters check above if the signature check)
Fixes #76358