Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LLD] [docs] Add a release note for the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support #81388

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

mstorsjo
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mstorsjo mstorsjo added this to the LLVM 18.X Release milestone Feb 10, 2024
@llvmbot llvmbot added the lld label Feb 10, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 10, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld

Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81388.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+5)
diff --git a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index fa0e7f2bc0b3ea..82f9d93b8e86ab 100644
--- a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ COFF Improvements
 * LLD now prefers library paths specified with ``-libpath:`` over the implicitly
   detected toolchain paths.
 
+* Use the ``SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`` environment variable for the PE header and
+  debug directory timestamps, if neither the ``/Brepro`` nor ``/timestamp:``
+  options have been specified. This makes the linker output reproducible by
+  setting this environment variable.
+
 MinGW Improvements
 ------------------
 

@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member Author

This goes along with/after #81384 (which is approved but not yet merged).

@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member Author

@tstellar Can this be merged? It has been approved. I'd like to add more release notes here, which would go on top of this.

@tstellar tstellar merged commit 8391421 into llvm:release/18.x Feb 16, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
@mstorsjo mstorsjo deleted the lld-source-date-epoch-relnotes branch February 16, 2024 09:12
@pointhex pointhex mentioned this pull request May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants