-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LLD] [test] Avoid printing timestamps past INT32_MAX with llvm-readobj #81463
Conversation
…m-readobj If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld @llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-coff Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo) ChangesIf llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81463.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lld/test/COFF/timestamp.test b/lld/test/COFF/timestamp.test
index c0658d6109811b..cc73af13c38ca6 100644
--- a/lld/test/COFF/timestamp.test
+++ b/lld/test/COFF/timestamp.test
@@ -4,19 +4,28 @@ RUN: lld-link %t.obj /debug /Brepro /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.1.exe
RUN: lld-link %t.obj /debug /Brepro /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.2.exe
RUN: lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:0 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.3.exe
RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=0 lld-link %t.obj /debug /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.4.exe
-RUN: lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:4294967295 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.5.exe
-RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=4294967295 lld-link %t.obj /debug /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.6.exe
+# Test timestamps corresponding to INT32_TMAX
+RUN: lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:2147483647 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.5.exe
+RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=2147483647 lld-link %t.obj /debug /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.6.exe
+# Test that the command line option /timestamp has precedence over SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=12345 lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:0 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.7.exe
-RUN: env LLD_IN_TEST=1 not lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:4294967296 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.8.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERROR
-RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=4294967296 env LLD_IN_TEST=1 not lld-link %t.obj /debug /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.9.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERROR2
+# Test timestamps corresponding to UINT32_TMAX
+RUN: lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:4294967295 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.8.exe
+RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=4294967295 lld-link %t.obj /debug /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.9.exe
+# Test that setting UINT32_MAX+1 as timestamp fails.
+RUN: env LLD_IN_TEST=1 not lld-link %t.obj /debug /timestamp:4294967296 /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.10.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERROR
+RUN: env SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=4294967296 env LLD_IN_TEST=1 not lld-link %t.obj /debug /entry:main /nodefaultlib /out:%t.11.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERROR2
RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.1.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=HASH
RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.2.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=HASH
RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.3.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ZERO
RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.4.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ZERO
-RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.5.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MAX
-RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.6.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MAX
+RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.5.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LARGE
+RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.6.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LARGE
RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers --coff-debug-directory %t.7.exe | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ZERO
+# Not inspecting %t.8.exe and %t.9.exe; llvm-readobj with a 32 bit time_t fails to print dates
+# past INT32_MAX correctly.
+
HASH: ImageFileHeader {
HASH: TimeDateStamp: [[STAMP:.*]]
HASH: DebugDirectory [
@@ -27,10 +36,10 @@ ZERO: TimeDateStamp: 1970-01-01 00:00:00 (0x0)
ZERO: DebugDirectory [
ZERO: TimeDateStamp: 1970-01-01 00:00:00 (0x0)
-MAX: ImageFileHeader {
-MAX: TimeDateStamp: 2106-02-07 06:28:15 (0xFFFFFFFF)
-MAX: DebugDirectory [
-MAX: TimeDateStamp: 2106-02-07 06:28:15 (0xFFFFFFFF)
+LARGE: ImageFileHeader {
+LARGE: TimeDateStamp: 2038-01-19 03:14:07 (0x7FFFFFFF)
+LARGE: DebugDirectory [
+LARGE: TimeDateStamp: 2038-01-19 03:14:07 (0x7FFFFFFF)
ERROR: error: invalid timestamp: 4294967296. Expected 32-bit integer
ERROR2: error: invalid SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH timestamp: 4294967296. Expected 32-bit integer
|
FWIW, I do know that it's possible to add lit conditionals, to conditionally test printing the larger timestamps, like clang has |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixes the test. I suggest we land this and you sort out the other questions with @MaskRay .
…bj (llvm#81463) If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly. (cherry picked from commit 0bf4ff2)
…bj (llvm#81463) If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly. (cherry picked from commit 0bf4ff2)
…bj (llvm#81463) If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly. (cherry picked from commit 0bf4ff2)
…bj (llvm#81463) If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly. (cherry picked from commit 0bf4ff2)
…bj (llvm#81463) If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly. (cherry picked from commit 0bf4ff2)
If llvm-readobj is built with a 32 bit time_t, it can't print such timestamps correctly.