-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ADT] Add APIntOps::abds signed absolute difference and rename absdiff -> abdu #84791
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon) ChangesWhen I created APIntOps::absdiff, I totally missed that we already have ISD::ABDS/ABDU nodes, and we use this term in other places/targets as well. I've added the APIntOps::abds implementation and renamed APIntOps::absdiff to APIntOps::abdu. Given that APIntOps::absdiff is so young I don't think we need to create a deprecation wrapper, but I can if anyone thinks it important. I'll do a KnownBits rename patch after this. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84791.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
index 1fc3c7b2236a17..bea3e28adf308f 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
@@ -2188,8 +2188,13 @@ inline const APInt &umax(const APInt &A, const APInt &B) {
return A.ugt(B) ? A : B;
}
+/// Determine the absolute difference of two APInts considered to be signed.
+inline const APInt abds(const APInt &A, const APInt &B) {
+ return A.sge(B) ? (A - B) : (B - A);
+}
+
/// Determine the absolute difference of two APInts considered to be unsigned.
-inline const APInt absdiff(const APInt &A, const APInt &B) {
+inline const APInt abdu(const APInt &A, const APInt &B) {
return A.uge(B) ? (A - B) : (B - A);
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
index 06fe716a22db0f..ccd4025fafe796 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
@@ -6066,9 +6066,9 @@ static std::optional<APInt> FoldValue(unsigned Opcode, const APInt &C1,
return (C1Ext + C2Ext + 1).extractBits(C1.getBitWidth(), 1);
}
case ISD::ABDS:
- return APIntOps::smax(C1, C2) - APIntOps::smin(C1, C2);
+ return APIntOps::abds(C1, C2);
case ISD::ABDU:
- return APIntOps::umax(C1, C2) - APIntOps::umin(C1, C2);
+ return APIntOps::abdu(C1, C2);
}
return std::nullopt;
}
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ADT/APIntTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/ADT/APIntTest.cpp
index 24324822356bf6..11237d2e1602dc 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ADT/APIntTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ADT/APIntTest.cpp
@@ -2532,38 +2532,72 @@ TEST(APIntTest, clearLowBits) {
EXPECT_EQ(16u, i32hi16.popcount());
}
-TEST(APIntTest, AbsDiff) {
- using APIntOps::absdiff;
+TEST(APIntTest, abds) {
+ using APIntOps::abds;
APInt MaxU1(1, 1, false);
APInt MinU1(1, 0, false);
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, absdiff(MaxU1, MinU1).getZExtValue());
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, absdiff(MinU1, MaxU1).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abds(MaxU1, MinU1).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abds(MinU1, MaxU1).getZExtValue());
APInt MaxU4(4, 15, false);
APInt MinU4(4, 0, false);
- EXPECT_EQ(15u, absdiff(MaxU4, MinU4).getZExtValue());
- EXPECT_EQ(15u, absdiff(MinU4, MaxU4).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, abds(MaxU4, MinU4).getSExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, abds(MinU4, MaxU4).getSExtValue());
APInt MaxS8(8, 127, true);
APInt MinS8(8, -128, true);
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, absdiff(MaxS8, MinS8).getZExtValue());
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, absdiff(MinS8, MaxS8).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, abds(MaxS8, MinS8).getSExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, abds(MinS8, MaxS8).getSExtValue());
APInt MaxU16(16, 65535, false);
APInt MinU16(16, 0, false);
- EXPECT_EQ(65535u, absdiff(MaxU16, MinU16).getZExtValue());
- EXPECT_EQ(65535u, absdiff(MinU16, MaxU16).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, abds(MaxU16, MinU16).getSExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, abds(MinU16, MaxU16).getSExtValue());
APInt MaxS16(16, 32767, true);
APInt MinS16(16, -32768, true);
APInt ZeroS16(16, 0, true);
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, absdiff(MaxS16, MinS16).getZExtValue());
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, absdiff(MinS16, MaxS16).getZExtValue());
- EXPECT_EQ(32768u, absdiff(ZeroS16, MinS16));
- EXPECT_EQ(32768u, absdiff(MinS16, ZeroS16));
- EXPECT_EQ(32767u, absdiff(ZeroS16, MaxS16));
- EXPECT_EQ(32767u, absdiff(MaxS16, ZeroS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, abds(MaxS16, MinS16).getSExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, abds(MinS16, MaxS16).getSExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(32768u, abds(ZeroS16, MinS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(32768u, abds(MinS16, ZeroS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(32767u, abds(ZeroS16, MaxS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(32767u, abds(MaxS16, ZeroS16));
+}
+
+TEST(APIntTest, abdu) {
+ using APIntOps::abdu;
+
+ APInt MaxU1(1, 1, false);
+ APInt MinU1(1, 0, false);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abdu(MaxU1, MinU1).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abdu(MinU1, MaxU1).getZExtValue());
+
+ APInt MaxU4(4, 15, false);
+ APInt MinU4(4, 0, false);
+ EXPECT_EQ(15u, abdu(MaxU4, MinU4).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(15u, abdu(MinU4, MaxU4).getZExtValue());
+
+ APInt MaxS8(8, 127, true);
+ APInt MinS8(8, -128, true);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abdu(MaxS8, MinS8).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abdu(MinS8, MaxS8).getZExtValue());
+
+ APInt MaxU16(16, 65535, false);
+ APInt MinU16(16, 0, false);
+ EXPECT_EQ(65535u, abdu(MaxU16, MinU16).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(65535u, abdu(MinU16, MaxU16).getZExtValue());
+
+ APInt MaxS16(16, 32767, true);
+ APInt MinS16(16, -32768, true);
+ APInt ZeroS16(16, 0, true);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abdu(MaxS16, MinS16).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, abdu(MinS16, MaxS16).getZExtValue());
+ EXPECT_EQ(32768u, abdu(ZeroS16, MinS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(32768u, abdu(MinS16, ZeroS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(32767u, abdu(ZeroS16, MaxS16));
+ EXPECT_EQ(32767u, abdu(MaxS16, ZeroS16));
}
TEST(APIntTest, GCD) {
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
index 658f3796721c4e..701876c7e418cd 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ TEST(KnownBitsTest, BinaryExhaustive) {
return KnownBits::absdiff(Known1, Known2);
},
[](const APInt &N1, const APInt &N2) {
- return APIntOps::absdiff(N1, N2);
+ return APIntOps::abdu(N1, N2);
},
checkCorrectnessOnlyBinary);
testBinaryOpExhaustive(
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
@@ -2188,8 +2188,13 @@ inline const APInt &umax(const APInt &A, const APInt &B) { | |||
return A.ugt(B) ? A : B; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/// Determine the absolute difference of two APInts considered to be signed. | |||
inline const APInt abds(const APInt &A, const APInt &B) { | |||
return A.sge(B) ? (A - B) : (B - A); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't need the parens (but I'm not insisting you remove them if you prefer them).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I always tend towards being overly cautious within ternary
[](const APInt &N1, const APInt &N2) { | ||
return APIntOps::absdiff(N1, N2); | ||
return APIntOps::abdu(N1, N2); | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you need the lambda at all? Can the whole entry be just APIntOps::abdu
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we can do that - the KnownBits function as well in many cases - although we've tended to keep the lambdas for all cases so far (smin/smax etc. above) - I have no strong preference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keeping the lambda seems silly if we don't need it, but we can always clean them all up later.
…f -> abdu When I created APIntOps::absdiff, I totally missed that we already have ISD::ABDS/ABDU nodes, and we use this term in other places/targets as well. I've added the APIntOps::abds implementation and renamed APIntOps::absdiff to APIntOps::abdu. Given that APIntOps::absdiff is so young I don't think we need to create a deprecation wrapper, but I can if anyone thinks it important. I'll do a KnownBits rename patch after this.
…bsdiff -> abdu When I created KnownBits::absdiff, I totally missed that we already have ISD::ABDS/ABDU nodes, and we use this term in other places/targets as well. I've added the KnownBits::abds implementation and renamed KnownBits::absdiff to KnownBits::abdu. Followup to llvm#84791
…bsdiff -> abdu When I created KnownBits::absdiff, I totally missed that we already have ISD::ABDS/ABDU nodes, and we use this term in other places/targets as well. I've added the KnownBits::abds implementation and renamed KnownBits::absdiff to KnownBits::abdu. Followup to llvm#84791
When I created APIntOps::absdiff, I totally missed that we already have ISD::ABDS/ABDU nodes, and we use this term in other places/targets as well.
I've added the APIntOps::abds implementation and renamed APIntOps::absdiff to APIntOps::abdu.
Given that APIntOps::absdiff is so young I don't think we need to create a deprecation wrapper, but I can if anyone thinks it important.
I'll do a KnownBits rename patch after this.