Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LV] Address postcommit review for PR84782 #84797

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

annamthomas
Copy link
Contributor

This testcase was added to show miscompile in
#81872

This testcase was added to show miscompile in
llvm#81872
@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Mar 11, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: None (annamthomas)

Changes

This testcase was added to show miscompile in
#81872


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84797.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll (+16-18)
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll
index c6b1944b200908..14acb6f57aa0c9 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll
@@ -3,15 +3,13 @@
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 
-@global = external global ptr addrspace(1), align 8
-
 ; PR 81872 explains the issue.
 
 ; If we vectorize, we have a miscompile where array IV and thereby value stored in (arr[99],
 ; arr[98]) is calculated incorrectly since disjoint or was only disjoint because
 ; of dominating conditions. Dropping the disjoint to avoid poison still changes
 ; the behaviour since now the or is no longer equivalent to the add.
-; Function Attrs: uwtable
+;
 define void @test(ptr noundef align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(16) %arr) #0 {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test(
 ; CHECK-SAME: ptr noundef align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(16) [[ARR:%.*]]) #[[ATTR0:[0-9]+]] {
@@ -45,43 +43,43 @@ define void @test(ptr noundef align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(16) %arr) #0 {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label [[BB6:%.*]], label [[SCALAR_PH]]
 ; CHECK:       scalar.ph:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[BC_RESUME_VAL:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 87, [[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ], [ 99, [[BB5:%.*]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BB15:%.*]]
-; CHECK:       bb15:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[BC_RESUME_VAL]], [[SCALAR_PH]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[BB20:%.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP_HEADER:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       loop.header:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[BC_RESUME_VAL]], [[SCALAR_PH]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[LOOP_LATCH:%.*]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[AND:%.*]] = and i64 [[IV]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ICMP17:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[AND]], 0
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[ICMP17]], label [[BB18:%.*]], label [[BB20]], !prof [[PROF5:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[ICMP17]], label [[BB18:%.*]], label [[LOOP_LATCH]], !prof [[PROF5:![0-9]+]]
 ; CHECK:       bb18:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR:%.*]] = or disjoint i64 [[IV]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[GETELEMENTPTR19:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr [[ARR]], i64 [[OR]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    store i64 1, ptr [[GETELEMENTPTR19]], align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BB20]]
-; CHECK:       bb20:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP_LATCH]]
+; CHECK:       loop.latch:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT]] = add nsw i64 [[IV]], -1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ICMP22:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[IV_NEXT]], 90
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[ICMP22]], label [[BB6]], label [[BB15]], !prof [[PROF6:![0-9]+]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP7:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[ICMP22]], label [[BB6]], label [[LOOP_HEADER]], !prof [[PROF6:![0-9]+]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP7:![0-9]+]]
 ; CHECK:       bb6:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
 ;
 bb5:
-  br label %bb15
+  br label %loop.header
 
-bb15:                                             ; preds = %bb20, %bb8
-  %iv = phi i64 [ 99, %bb5 ], [ %iv.next, %bb20 ]
+loop.header:                                             ; preds = %loop.latch, %bb8
+  %iv = phi i64 [ 99, %bb5 ], [ %iv.next, %loop.latch ]
   %and = and i64 %iv, 1
   %icmp17 = icmp eq i64 %and, 0
-  br i1 %icmp17, label %bb18, label %bb20, !prof !21
+  br i1 %icmp17, label %bb18, label %loop.latch, !prof !21
 
-bb18:                                             ; preds = %bb15
+bb18:                                             ; preds = %loop.header
   %or = or disjoint i64 %iv, 1
   %getelementptr19 = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr %arr, i64 %or
   store i64 1, ptr %getelementptr19, align 8
-  br label %bb20
+  br label %loop.latch
 
-bb20:                                             ; preds = %bb18, %bb15
+loop.latch:                                             ; preds = %bb18, %loop.header
   %iv.next = add nsw i64 %iv, -1
   %icmp22 = icmp eq i64 %iv.next, 90
-  br i1 %icmp22, label %bb6, label %bb15, !prof !22
+  br i1 %icmp22, label %bb6, label %loop.header, !prof !22
 
 bb6:
   ret void

@annamthomas annamthomas merged commit 866ac9a into llvm:main Mar 11, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants