-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[libc++] Tweak how we check constraints on shared_ptr(nullptr_t) #94996
[libc++] Tweak how we check constraints on shared_ptr(nullptr_t) #94996
Conversation
This avoids breaking code that should arguably be valid but technically isn't after enforcing the constraints on shared_ptr's constructors. A new LWG issue was filed to fix this in the Standard. This patch applies the expected resolution of this issue to avoid flip-flopping users whose code should always be considered valid. See llvm#93071 for more context.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Louis Dionne (ldionne) ChangesThis avoids breaking code that should arguably be valid but technically isn't after enforcing the constraints on shared_ptr's constructors. A new LWG issue was filed to fix this in the Standard. This patch applies the expected resolution of this issue to avoid flip-flopping users whose code should always be considered valid. See #93071 for more context. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94996.diff 5 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__memory/shared_ptr.h b/libcxx/include/__memory/shared_ptr.h
index 00db96185be7c..7b5002cb95d32 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__memory/shared_ptr.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__memory/shared_ptr.h
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ struct __shared_ptr_deleter_ctor_reqs {
};
template <class _Dp, class _Tp>
-using __shared_ptr_nullptr_deleter_ctor_reqs = _And<is_move_constructible<_Dp>, __well_formed_deleter<_Dp, nullptr_t> >;
+using __shared_ptr_nullptr_deleter_ctor_reqs = _And<is_move_constructible<_Dp>, __well_formed_deleter<_Dp, _Tp*> >;
#if defined(_LIBCPP_ABI_ENABLE_SHARED_PTR_TRIVIAL_ABI)
# define _LIBCPP_SHARED_PTR_TRIVIAL_ABI __attribute__((__trivial_abi__))
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter.pass.cpp
index 13340ed5294c0..9c93f2e361d24 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter.pass.cpp
@@ -33,16 +33,15 @@ int A::count = 0;
// https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3233
static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, bad_deleter>::value, "");
-static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, no_nullptr_deleter>::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, no_move_deleter>::value, "");
#if TEST_STD_VER >= 17
-static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int> >::value, "");
+static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int[]> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, bad_deleter>::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, no_nullptr_deleter>::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, no_move_deleter>::value, "");
-static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int> >::value, "");
+static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int[5]> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, bad_deleter>::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, no_nullptr_deleter>::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, no_move_deleter>::value, "");
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
index 53ca6fb5b234d..f95b9e68dad01 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
@@ -34,16 +34,15 @@ int A::count = 0;
// https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3233
static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int>, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, bad_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
-static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, no_nullptr_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int>, std::nullptr_t, no_move_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
#if TEST_STD_VER >= 17
-static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int>, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
+static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int[]>, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, bad_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, no_nullptr_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[]>, std::nullptr_t, no_move_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
-static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int>, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
+static_assert( std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, test_deleter<int[5]>, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, bad_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, no_nullptr_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::shared_ptr<int[5]>, std::nullptr_t, no_move_deleter, test_allocator<int> >::value, "");
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp
index 562acf56d96fe..bcae00ef2e031 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp
@@ -115,6 +115,12 @@ int main(int, char**)
}
#endif // TEST_STD_VER >= 11
+ {
+ // See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93071#issuecomment-2158494851
+ auto deleter = [](auto pointer) { delete pointer; };
+ std::shared_ptr<int> p(new int, deleter);
+ }
+
test_function_type();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
index 9dffbcdd59a73..66adff62b0707 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
@@ -165,5 +165,11 @@ int main(int, char**)
test_allocator<Derived[4]> >::value, "");
}
+ {
+ // See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93071#issuecomment-2158494851
+ auto deleter = [](auto pointer) { delete pointer; };
+ std::shared_ptr<int> p(new int, deleter, std::allocator<int>());
+ }
+
return 0;
}
|
You can test this locally with the following command:git-clang-format --diff 6b21e170497ae69a387ff3eebae025926742bb84 5282c05d0e407718288f1b015c65ffd6621ff367 -- libcxx/include/__memory/shared_ptr.h libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/nullptr_t_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp View the diff from clang-format here.diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp
index 97dd2fcb22..96814d5346 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter.pass.cpp
@@ -123,6 +123,6 @@ int main(int, char**)
}
#endif
- test_function_type();
- return 0;
+ test_function_type();
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
index b90c69efd9..b7d34da245 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.const/pointer_deleter_allocator.pass.cpp
@@ -173,5 +173,5 @@ int main(int, char**)
}
#endif
- return 0;
+ return 0;
}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks! This will allow avoiding unnecessary changes, given the expected resolution (and until there is resolution on the new LWG issue).
Code formatter is still not happy. |
Apparently, people rely on
Do you know if |
Oh, that's not all. Some code also relies on
(found in https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-rendering/blob/f3d30738726d11d240907e30699ce4c66e8a0f50/src/ShaderParam.cc#L119, for example) |
This avoids breaking code that should arguably be valid but technically isn't after enforcing the constraints on shared_ptr's constructors. A new LWG issue was filed to fix this in the Standard.
This patch applies the expected resolution of this issue to avoid flip-flopping users whose code should always be considered valid.
See #93071 for more context.