Skip to content

Finding holes in a polygon coverage #986

Answered by dr-jts
micycle1 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

CoverageUnion is pretty efficient, so if you want an easy way to detect holes that's the best thing to use. Theoretically you might be able to do it a bit faster with a custom algorithm, but that's a lot of work for a small performance gain.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by micycle1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants