Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add codecov integration #687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2017
Merged

Conversation

mbeacom
Copy link
Member

@mbeacom mbeacom commented Nov 15, 2017

Purpose

The goal of this PR is to add automated coverage reports via https://codecov.io/

Additional steps required

  • Eventually needs repo owner to configure the integration at: https://github.com/integration/codecov
  • Configure GitHub policy to allow or deny contributor ability to override the integration PR enforcement in the event of a decrease in coverage

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@bf8d15c). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #687   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   66.16%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       16           
  Lines             ?     1407           
  Branches          ?      215           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      931           
  Misses            ?      429           
  Partials          ?       47

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bf8d15c...3265124. Read the comment docs.

@mbeacom mbeacom merged commit 152982f into locustio:master Nov 16, 2017
@mbeacom mbeacom deleted the codecov-integration branch November 16, 2017 02:44
@cgoldberg cgoldberg added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Apr 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants