Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AMRNAV-6339 Enable IPC for rosbag recorder and foxglove bridge: Disable IPC for transient local topics #67

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

HovorunB
Copy link

@HovorunB HovorunB commented Feb 16, 2024

Basic Info

Info Please fill out this column
Ticket(s) this addresses https://lvserv01.logivations.com/browse/AMRNAV-6339
Primary OS tested on Ubuntu
Robotic platform tested on (Steve's Robot, gazebo simulation of Tally, hardware turtlebot)

Description of contribution in a few bullet points

  • Disable intra process comms for transient local topics, as this is not supported yet
    (The rclcpp PR that adds support for intra process communication to serialized subscribers was developed separately from the rclcpp PR that adds support for intra process communication to transient local topics)

Related PRs:

https://github.com/logivations/deep_cv/pull/7386

pixel-robotics/rclcpp#3
pixel-robotics/ros-foxglove-bridge#1

@HovorunB HovorunB added the draft label Feb 16, 2024
@HovorunB HovorunB self-assigned this Feb 16, 2024
@HovorunB HovorunB changed the title AMRNAV-6339 Enable IPC for rosbag recorder and foxglove bridge AMRNAV-6339 Enable IPC for rosbag recorder and foxglove bridge: Disable IPC for transient local topics Feb 16, 2024
@HovorunB HovorunB removed the draft label Feb 16, 2024
@HovorunB HovorunB merged commit f48bfc6 into iron Feb 20, 2024
HovorunB added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
AMRNAV-6339 Enable IPC for rosbag recorder and foxglove bridge: Disable IPC for transient local topics
HovorunB added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Merge pull request #67 from logivations/AMRNAV-6339
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants