Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not rely on function names to populate Sharp's prototype so that the library can be minified. Fixes #1474. #1475

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2018

Conversation

jaubourg
Copy link
Contributor

@jaubourg jaubourg commented Nov 23, 2018

That should solve the issue. All unit tests are passing on my machine. I wasn't able to control if there were no other issues in the code regarding minification compatibility since msbuild is being particularly difficult when I reference sharp as a file: dependency.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.008%) to 98.97% when pulling ee635e0 on jaubourg:minification-proofing into d26ccf6 on lovell:master.

@jaubourg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coverage decreasing... that's what happens when you remove lines of code :/

@lovell lovell merged commit 383b933 into lovell:master Nov 26, 2018
@lovell
Copy link
Owner

lovell commented Nov 26, 2018

Fantastique, merci beaucoup.

@lovell lovell added this to the v0.21.1 milestone Nov 26, 2018
lovell added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2018
@jaubourg jaubourg deleted the minification-proofing branch August 12, 2019 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants