-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Development
: Update read the docs config
#10054
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves updating copyright and authorship information across multiple files. The changes primarily affect the LICENSE file and documentation configuration, shifting the copyright holder from "TUM Applied Software Engineering" to "TUM Applied Education Technologies". The modifications are administrative in nature, updating organizational references while maintaining the core content and structure of the documents. Changes
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/admin/setup/distributed.rst (4)
20-20
: Simplify the statement for clarityThe statement "Artemis also supports this setup (which is also used at TUM)" is redundant with "also" appearing twice. Consider simplifying it to "Artemis supports this setup (which is used at TUM)" or just "This setup is supported by Artemis".
Line range hint
1024-1025
: Add security warnings and prerequisites for each OS setupConsider adding the following for each OS section:
- Prerequisites checklist (required software versions, permissions, etc.)
- Security considerations for production deployments
- Troubleshooting section for common issues
This will help users prepare their environment properly and avoid security pitfalls.
Also applies to: 1048-1049, 1058-1059
Line range hint
147-196
: Add configuration validation stepsConsider adding validation steps after the Eureka configuration section to help users verify their setup:
- How to verify the Eureka connection is successful
- Common error messages and their solutions
- Health check endpoints to monitor
This will help users confirm their configuration is working as expected.
Line range hint
1-1064
: Enhance documentation with additional cross-referencesThe documentation is well-structured, but consider adding:
- A table of contents at the beginning
- Cross-references between related sections
- Links to external documentation for third-party components
- A troubleshooting section at the end
This will improve navigation and help users find related information quickly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/.readthedocs.yaml
is excluded by!**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
LICENSE
(1 hunks)docs/admin/setup/distributed.rst
(1 hunks)docs/conf.py
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- LICENSE
- docs/conf.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/admin/setup/distributed.rst (1)
Line range hint 1-1064
: Documentation changes look good!
The documentation updates are comprehensive and well-structured. The changes successfully:
- Update copyright and organizational references
- Add detailed multi-instance setup instructions
- Include OS-specific configuration steps
- Provide clear technical guidance
While there are some suggestions for improvements, the core changes are solid and ready to be merged.
Checklist
Motivation and Context
I received the following email:
Summary by CodeRabbit