Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Remove unnecessary build plan information from the exam conduction payload #8059

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

laurenzfb
Copy link
Contributor

@laurenzfb laurenzfb commented Feb 21, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.

Changes affecting Programming Exercises

  • High priority: I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types on a test server configured with the integrated lifecycle setup (LocalVC and LocalCI).

Motivation and Context

Build script and config are included in the server payload sent to the client when a student exam is being conducted. They contain information the student should not be able to see.

Description

This PR removes both fields before the payload is sent to the client.

Exam Mode Testing

Prerequisites:

  • 1 Student
  • 1 Exam with a Programming Exercise
  1. Open developer tools in your browser and go the network tab
  2. When starting the exam, you should receive a item "conduction"
  3. Check the payload. The object should not contain the fields buildScript and buildPlanConfiguration

Testserver States

Note

These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked







Review Progress

Performance Review

  • I (as a reviewer) confirm that the server changes (in particular related to database calls) are implemented with a very good performance

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Exam Mode Test

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Test Coverage

Server

Class/File Line Coverage Confirmation (assert/expect)
ProgrammingExercise.java 91%
StudentExamResource.java 86%

Screenshots

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced privacy by removing build script and configuration information from programming exercises before quizzes are loaded.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Ensured that programming exercises are properly prepared with default build plan creation for both tests and exercises.
  • Tests
    • Expanded integration tests to cover new scenarios, including the addition of text modeling programming exercises to exams and the verification of programming exercise properties.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) label Feb 21, 2024
@laurenzfb laurenzfb temporarily deployed to artemis-test6.artemis.cit.tum.de February 21, 2024 14:52 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@laurenzfb laurenzfb marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2024 15:02
@laurenzfb laurenzfb requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2024 15:02
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing security and testing for programming exercises within a learning management system. Key changes include stripping build scripts and configurations from programming exercises to safeguard sensitive information during quiz conduction. Additionally, the testing framework has been expanded to cover new scenarios involving text, modeling, and programming exercises, ensuring a more robust examination process. These changes contribute to a secure and comprehensive testing environment for students.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../web/rest/StudentExamResource.java Removed build script and configuration information from programming exercises before loading quizzes.
.../domain/ProgrammingExercise.java Added nullification of build plan configuration and build script in filterSensitiveInformation().
.../exam/StudentExamIntegrationTest.java Enhanced exam utility service to include various exercise types and added assertions for ProgrammingExercise properties.
.../programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseFactory.java Set up build script and build plan configuration for unreleased programming exercises.
.../programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java, .../programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java Introduced AeolusTarget enumeration and forceDefaultBuildPlanCreation method for testing with default build plan creation.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

tobias-lippert
tobias-lippert previously approved these changes Feb 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@tobias-lippert tobias-lippert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM, can you add/extend a test for this change?

@Strohgelaender
Copy link
Contributor

Is this only an issue for this one endpoint? If not, you should probably add this to the filterSensitiveInformation method that gets consitently used for many endpoints.

rstief
rstief previously approved these changes Feb 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rstief rstief left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good 😃
But yeah this should probably be checked in a test :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code

pzdr7
pzdr7 previously approved these changes Feb 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@pzdr7 pzdr7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reapproving as only the server tests have change since my previous review

@laurenzfb laurenzfb dismissed stale reviews from pzdr7 and MaximilianAnzinger via c25d901 February 22, 2024 11:20
Copy link
Contributor

@pzdr7 pzdr7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reapprove

Copy link
Contributor

@reschandreas reschandreas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested locally, works as exepected. Thanks for fixing this!

Copy link
Member

@bassner bassner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bassner bassner added this to the 6.8.2 milestone Feb 23, 2024
@bassner bassner changed the title Integrated code lifecycle: Remove build script and config from student exam Development: Remove unnecessary build plan information from the exam conduction payload Feb 23, 2024
@bassner bassner merged commit a665f9b into develop Feb 23, 2024
49 of 51 checks passed
@bassner bassner deleted the development/remove-build-config-from-exam branch February 23, 2024 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:integrated code lifecycle ready to merge server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) small tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants