Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Programming exercises: Fix an issue when editing build scripts #8109

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 2, 2024

Conversation

reschandreas
Copy link
Contributor

@reschandreas reschandreas commented Mar 1, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.

Changes affecting Programming Exercises

  • High priority: I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types on a test server configured with the integrated lifecycle setup (LocalVC and LocalCI).
  • I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types on a test server configured with Gitlab and Jenkins.
  • I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types on a test server configured with Bitbucket and Bamboo.

Motivation and Context

Due to a small bug in the storing and editing code in the server the build script was not always stored correctly, this PR fixes that.

Description

I store the build script after adding it by saving the programming exercise.

Steps for Testing

Prerequisites:

  • 1 Instructor
  1. Log in to Artemis
  2. Create a programming exercise with a custom build script
  3. Save, and go to edit -> the default build script should be there

Testserver States

Note

These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked







Review Progress

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Manual Tests

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Test Coverage

Screenshots

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced the backend logic for programming exercises, including updates to handling of files and build configurations.
    • Improved integration with auxiliary repositories and submission policies.
    • Added new service classes for exercise specifications, participation, profiles, and submission policies.
    • Updated imports and declarations for better code organization.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) label Mar 1, 2024
@reschandreas reschandreas marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2024 13:07
@reschandreas reschandreas requested a review from a team as a code owner March 1, 2024 13:07
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates made to the programming exercise service encompass a comprehensive overhaul aimed at enhancing functionality and streamlining processes. These changes include integrating various Java utility classes, introducing new service classes to bolster existing capabilities, refining the management of key entities like auxiliary repositories, courses, and exercise specifics, and improving logic related to test cases, user interactions, and version control system (VCS) repository URIs.

Changes

Files Change Summary
ProgrammingExerciseService.java - Imported utility classes (ArrayList, Arrays, Collection, Collections, List, Objects, Optional).
- Modified declarations for AuxiliaryRepository, Course, ProgrammingExercise, ProgrammingExerciseTestCase, Repository, User, VcsRepositoryUri, and various enumerations.
- Added service classes: ExerciseSpecificationService, ParticipationService, ProfileService, SubmissionPolicyService.
- Updated logic for handling windfiles and build plan configurations.
ProgrammingExerciseStudentParticipationRepository.java The change introduces an additional condition in the unsetBuildPlanIdForExercise method to only update the buildPlanId and initializationState for participations with a specific exerciseId and InitializationState.INITIALIZED.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@reschandreas reschandreas changed the title Development: consistently store build script Development: Consistently store build script Mar 1, 2024
@laurenzfb laurenzfb temporarily deployed to artemis-test6.artemis.cit.tum.de March 1, 2024 13:14 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@laurenzfb laurenzfb temporarily deployed to artemis-test3.artemis.cit.tum.de March 1, 2024 13:19 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
laurenzfb
laurenzfb previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@laurenzfb laurenzfb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested on ts3, code lgtm

rstief
rstief previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rstief rstief left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@milljoniaer milljoniaer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested, works as expected 👍

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024

⚠️ Unable to deploy to test servers ⚠️

Testserver "artemis-test3.artemis.cit.tum.de" is already in use by PR #8110.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the deployment-error Added by deployment workflows if an error occured label Mar 1, 2024
milljoniaer
milljoniaer previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@milljoniaer milljoniaer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested locally, works as expected

@reschandreas reschandreas removed the deployment-error Added by deployment workflows if an error occured label Mar 1, 2024
mateusmm01
mateusmm01 previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mateusmm01 mateusmm01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code lgtm

@reschandreas reschandreas dismissed stale reviews from mateusmm01 and milljoniaer via 59279a9 March 2, 2024 07:46
Copy link
Contributor

@laurenzfb laurenzfb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reapprove after changes

Copy link
Member

@krusche krusche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me

@krusche krusche changed the title Development: Consistently store build script Programming exercises: Fix an issue when editing build scripts Mar 2, 2024
@krusche krusche merged commit a556aac into develop Mar 2, 2024
27 of 35 checks passed
@krusche krusche deleted the improvement/consistently-save-build-script branch March 2, 2024 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants