-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Development
: Adapt documentation for SSH proxy in LocalVC
#9644
Development
: Adapt documentation for SSH proxy in LocalVC
#9644
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation for the production setup of Artemis has been updated in two key areas. First, the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs/admin/setup.rst (1)
11-13
: Consider expanding the Ansible collection description.
While the current description is good, it could be enhanced by:
- Mentioning that it specifically handles the SSH proxy and Nginx configuration
- Adding a note about compatibility with multi-node setups
Here's a suggested enhancement:
We recommend using the `Artemis Ansible Collection <https://github.com/ls1intum/artemis-ansible-collection>`_ for
setting up Artemis in production. The collection provides a set of Ansible roles that automate the setup of Artemis,
-including the required external system with sane configuration defaults.
+including the required external systems with sane configuration defaults. It handles complex setups like SSH proxy
+configuration, Nginx setup, and ensures consistent configuration across multi-node environments.
docs/admin/setup/security.rst (3)
129-131
: Enhance the SSH proxy introduction with additional context.
Consider adding:
- Rationale for choosing port 7921
- Firewall configuration requirements
- Security implications of exposing SSH
160-160
: Add configuration verification and troubleshooting steps.
Consider adding these important steps:
- Verify Nginx configuration before restart
- Test SSH connectivity
- Basic troubleshooting guidance
Add these verification steps:
# Test nginx configuration
sudo nginx -t
# Restart nginx
sudo systemctl restart nginx
# Verify nginx status
sudo systemctl status nginx
# Test SSH connectivity
ssh -vv -p 7921 user@yourdomain.com
129-160
: Consider adding architecture diagrams and deployment scenarios.
To better illustrate the SSH proxy setup:
- Add a network architecture diagram showing traffic flow
- Include different deployment scenarios (single node vs multi-node)
- Document how this integrates with the Artemis Ansible Collection
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/admin/setup.rst (1 hunks)
- docs/admin/setup/security.rst (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/admin/setup.rst (1)
11-13
: LGTM! The Ansible collection recommendation is a valuable addition.
The added reference to the Artemis Ansible Collection provides users with a reliable automation option for production setup, which will help ensure consistent configuration across environments.
Let's verify the Ansible collection link and documentation:
✅ Verification successful
The Ansible collection link is valid and references are consistent across documentation
The verification confirms:
- The Ansible collection repository exists and is accessible
- All references to Ansible in the documentation are consistent and up-to-date
- The collection is properly referenced in both setup and troubleshooting documentation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Ansible collection link and check for any other references
# that might need updating
# Test 1: Verify the link to Ansible collection is valid
gh repo view ls1intum/artemis-ansible-collection --json name >/dev/null || echo "Invalid repository link"
# Test 2: Check for any other mentions of Ansible that might need updating
rg -i "ansible" --type rst
Length of output: 1023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes LGTM 👍 Did something change in Nginx so that SSH traffic can now be routed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New fixed docs look good to me
Just because it's interesting for me: Why do you proxy the requests at all? I mean, you could directly map the ports even if it runs locally, right? |
@dfuchss We mainly use the proxy to distribute the requests to the nodes. For a single node setup, you are right that this is not necessarily relevant. |
Infrastructure
: Adapt documentation for SSH proxyDevelopment
: Adapt documentation for SSH proxy in LocalVC
Checklist
General
Motivation and Context
We use a slightly different configuration of Nginx in our production and testing setups. We want the documentation to be consistent with the configuration we use.
Description
We adapted the sample configuration for Nginx. We also added a reference to our Ansible collection which can be used to automate the setup process.
Steps for Testing
Read the updated documentation: https://artemis-platform--9644.org.readthedocs.build/en/9644/
Review Progress
Code Review
Summary by CodeRabbit