Development: Fix failing server style
#9912
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
server
WalkthroughThe changes introduce two static methods, Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 pmd (7.7.0)src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/scaparser/format/sarif/Result.javaThe following rules are missing or misspelled in your ruleset file category/vm/bestpractices.xml: BooleanInstantiation, DontImportJavaLang, DuplicateImports, EmptyFinallyBlock, EmptyIfStmt, EmptyInitializer, EmptyStatementBlock, EmptyStatementNotInLoop, EmptySwitchStatements, EmptySynchronizedBlock, EmptyTryBlock, EmptyWhileStmt, ExcessiveClassLength, ExcessiveMethodLength, ImportFromSamePackage, MissingBreakInSwitch, SimplifyBooleanAssertion. Please check your ruleset configuration. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/scaparser/format/sarif/Result.java (2)
Line range hint
114-132: Enhance error handling in Kind.fromValue()The implementation follows good practices with proper documentation and reuse of the CONSTANTS map. However, the error handling could be more robust and informative.
Consider enhancing the error handling:
@JsonCreator public static Kind fromValue(String value) { + Objects.requireNonNull(value, "Input value cannot be null"); Kind constant = CONSTANTS.get(value); if (constant == null) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException(value); + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid Kind value: '" + value + "'. Expected one of: " + + CONSTANTS.keySet()); } return constant; }
Line range hint
165-183: Enhance error handling and simplify Level.fromValue()The implementation maintains good consistency with Kind.fromValue(). However, there are opportunities for both enhanced error handling and code simplification.
Consider these improvements:
@JsonCreator public static Level fromValue(String value) { + Objects.requireNonNull(value, "Input value cannot be null"); Level constant = CONSTANTS.get(value); if (constant == null) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException(value); + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid Level value: '" + value + "'. Expected one of: " + + CONSTANTS.keySet()); } - else { - return constant; - } + return constant; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/scaparser/format/sarif/Result.java(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/scaparser/format/sarif/Result.java (1)
Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/scaparser/format/sarif/Result.java (1)
Line range hint 114-132: Verify usage patterns and JSON deserialization
Let's verify the implementation consistency and usage patterns across the codebase.
Also applies to: 165-183
✅ Verification successful
Implementation pattern is consistent and correctly used
The Kind and Level enum implementations with @JsonCreator and fromValue methods follow a consistent pattern for JSON deserialization. The verification shows:
- Both enums are properly implemented with string-based mapping and null checks
- The pattern is used consistently within the SARIF parser context
- The implementation follows Jackson's best practices for enum deserialization
- No other similar enums in the codebase require this pattern, as these are specific to the SARIF format parsing
The implementation is correct and doesn't require any changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar enum patterns and usage
echo "Checking for similar enum patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ {
$$$
@JsonCreator
public static $_ fromValue(String value) {
$$$
}
}'
echo "Checking for JsonCreator usage..."
rg "@JsonCreator" -A 5
echo "Checking for potential enum value conversions..."
rg "Kind\.fromValue|Level\.fromValue"
Length of output: 4780
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the enum definitions and their usage patterns more thoroughly
# Check the full enum definitions
echo "Checking Kind enum definition..."
rg -A 20 "enum Kind"
echo "Checking Level enum definition..."
rg -A 20 "enum Level"
# Check for any direct usage of these enums
echo "Checking enum usage..."
rg "Kind\.|Level\." -A 2
# Check for any JSON deserialization related code
echo "Checking JSON deserialization context..."
rg "@JsonProperty.*Kind|@JsonProperty.*Level" -A 2
Length of output: 50465
Checklist
General
Server
Motivation and Context
The server style checks are currently failing on develop.
Description
Fixes the failing server style checks.
Steps for Testing
Make sure the server style checks pass in the github actions below.
Review Progress
Code Review