Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync to upstream/release/601 #1084

Merged
merged 198 commits into from
Oct 27, 2023
Merged

Sync to upstream/release/601 #1084

merged 198 commits into from
Oct 27, 2023

Conversation

AmaranthineCodices
Copy link
Contributor

What's changed

Native Codegen

  • Fixed a pair of issues when lowering bit32.extract
  • Fixed a narrow edge case that could result in an infinite loop without an interruption
  • Fixed a negative array out-of-bounds access issue
  • Temporarily reverted linear block predecessor value propagation

New type solver

  • We now type check assignments to annotated variables
  • Fixed some test cases under local type inference
  • Moved isPending checks for type families to improve performance
  • Optimized our process for testing if a free type is sufficiently solved
  • Removed "none ptr" from lea instruction disassembly logging

Build system & tooling

  • CMake configuration now validates dependencies to maintain separation between components
  • Improvements to the fuzzer coverage
  • Deduplicator for fuzzed callstacks

vegorov-rbx and others added 28 commits September 7, 2023 16:33
Co-authored-by: Aaron Weiss <aaronweiss@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander McCord <amccord@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Andy Friesen <afriesen@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Aviral Goel <agoel@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Lily Brown <lbrown@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Vighnesh Vijay <vvijay@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@roblox.com>
@AmaranthineCodices AmaranthineCodices merged commit e5ec0cd into master Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Exceeded allowed depth big & chain
7 participants