-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: optimized accessibility icons #1574
feat: optimized accessibility icons #1574
Conversation
@karsa-mistmere @ericfennis is a change like we see in the thumb of the hand icon acceptable? |
@jguddas No, now it creates a blurry line. See 100% view. |
<path d="m5 8 3-3 5.5 3-2.4 3.5" /> | ||
<path d="M4.2 14.5a5 5 0 0 0 6.92 6" /> | ||
<path d="M13.8 17.5a5 5 0 0 0-6.92-6" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<path d="m2 2 20 20" /> | ||
<path d="M6 18.5a3.5 3.5 0 1 0 7 0c0-1.57.92-2.52 2-3.5" /> | ||
<path d="M6 8.5a6.58 6.58 0 0 1 .36-2.14" /> | ||
<path d="M8.8 3.2A6.5 6.5 0 0 1 19 8.5a7.16 7.16 0 0 1-1.09 3.76" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This path is pretty over-optimized and off grid, the bottom part isn't even an arc, so I think we should stick with a curve:
<path d="M8.8 3.2A6.5 6.5 0 0 1 19 8.5a7.16 7.16 0 0 1-1.09 3.76" /> | |
<path d="M8.81 3.15A6.5 6.5 0 0 1 17.85 12.19c0 1.63-.44 2.81-1.09 3.76" /> |
<path d="m4.9 4.9 4.3 4.3" /> | ||
<path d="m14.8 9.2 4.3-4.3" /> | ||
<path d="m14.8 14.8 4.3 4.3" /> | ||
<path d="m9.2 14.8-4.3 4.3" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one's also very over-optimised:
I think the original was just fine:
<path d="m4.9 4.9 4.3 4.3" /> | |
<path d="m14.8 9.2 4.3-4.3" /> | |
<path d="m14.8 14.8 4.3 4.3" /> | |
<path d="m9.2 14.8-4.3 4.3" /> | |
<path d="m4.93 4.93 4.24 4.24" /> | |
<path d="m14.83 9.17 4.24-4.24" /> | |
<path d="m14.83 14.83 4.24 4.24" /> | |
<path d="m9.17 14.83-4.24 4.24" /> |
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ | |||
stroke-linecap="round" | |||
stroke-linejoin="round" | |||
> | |||
<path d="M8.8 20v-4.1l1.9.2a2.3 2.3 0 0 0 2.164-2.1V8.3A5.37 5.37 0 0 0 2 8.25c0 2.8.656 3.054 1 4.55a5.77 5.77 0 0 1 .029 2.758L2 20" /> | |||
<path d="M8.8 20v-4.1l1.9.2a2.3 2.3 0 0 0 2.164-2.1l.036-5.7A5.37 5.37 0 0 0 2 8.25c0 2.8.656 3.054 1 4.55a5.77 5.77 0 0 1 .029 2.758L2 20" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure what happened to this one but both versions are totally off grid. This is more in line with the original design and is even smaller:
<path d="M8.8 20v-4.1l1.9.2a2.3 2.3 0 0 0 2.164-2.1l.036-5.7A5.37 5.37 0 0 0 2 8.25c0 2.8.656 3.054 1 4.55a5.77 5.77 0 0 1 .029 2.758L2 20" /> | |
<path d="M9 20v-4.44c1 .37 2.15.7 3 .07a2.5 2.5 0 0 0 1-2V8.5a5.5 5.5 0 1 0-11 0c0 2.8.66 2.8 1 4.3.23.9.24 1.85.03 2.76L2 20" /> |
<path d="M17.7 6.3h.01" /> | ||
<path d="M17.7 17.7h.01" /> | ||
<path d="M6.3 17.7h.01" /> | ||
<path d="M6.3 6.3h.01" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is also sorely over-optimised.
<path d="M17.7 6.3h.01" /> | |
<path d="M17.7 17.7h.01" /> | |
<path d="M6.3 17.7h.01" /> | |
<path d="M6.3 6.3h.01" /> | |
<path d="M17.66 6.34h.01" /> | |
<path d="M17.66 17.66h.01" /> | |
<path d="M6.34 17.66h.01" /> | |
<path d="M6.34 6.44h.01" /> |
<path d="m18.4 5.6-.7.7" /> | ||
<path d="m6.3 17.7-.7.7" /> | ||
<path d="m5.6 5.6.7.7" /> | ||
<path d="m17.7 17.7.7.7" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<path d="m18.4 5.6-.7.7" /> | |
<path d="m6.3 17.7-.7.7" /> | |
<path d="m5.6 5.6.7.7" /> | |
<path d="m17.7 17.7.7.7" /> | |
<path d="m18.36 5.64-.7.7"/> | |
<path d="m6.34 17.66-.7.7"/> | |
<path d="m5.64 5.64.7.7"/> | |
<path d="m17.66 17.66.7.7"/> |
<path d="m4.9 4.9 1.4 1.4" /> | ||
<path d="m17.7 17.7 1.4 1.4" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Over-optimised.
<path d="m4.9 4.9 1.4 1.4" /> | |
<path d="m17.7 17.7 1.4 1.4" /> | |
<path d="m4.93 4.93 1.41 1.41" /> | |
<path d="m17.66 17.66 1.41 1.41" /> |
<path d="m6.3 17.7-1.4 1.4" /> | ||
<path d="m19.1 4.9-1.4 1.4" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Over-optimised.
<path d="m6.3 17.7-1.4 1.4" /> | |
<path d="m19.1 4.9-1.4 1.4" /> | |
<path d="m6.34 17.66-1.41 1.41" /> | |
<path d="m19.07 4.93-1.41 1.41" /> |
<line x1="11" x2="11" y1="8" y2="14" /> | ||
<line x1="8" x2="14" y1="11" y2="11" /> | ||
<path d="M11 8v6" /> | ||
<path d="m21 21-4.3-4.3" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<path d="m21 21-4.3-4.3" /> | |
<path d="m21 21-4.34-4.34" /> |
@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ | |||
stroke-linejoin="round" | |||
> | |||
<circle cx="11" cy="11" r="8" /> | |||
<line x1="21" x2="16.65" y1="21" y2="16.65" /> | |||
<line x1="8" x2="14" y1="11" y2="11" /> | |||
<path d="m21 21-4.3-4.3" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<path d="m21 21-4.3-4.3" /> | |
<path d="m21 21-4.34-4.34" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
search
should also be updated accordingly.
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
@jguddas Why did you close this one? 🤔 |
Gotta have to split it up and make it one PR per icon. |
No description provided.