Add route prefix macro and specs

[rnice01]

Fixes #1087

Purpose

This PR is for issue #1087 for adding a route_prefix macro for Lucky::Actions. This will prefix all the routes added by the HTTP method and match macros.

Checklist

• - An issue already exists detailing the issue/or feature request that this PR fixes
• - All specs are formatted with crystal tool format spec src
• - Inline documentation has been added and/or updated
• - Lucky builds on docker with ./script/setup
• - All builds and specs pass on docker with ./script/test

[jwoertink]

Super stoked for this! A few of my apps already need something like this.

[paulcsmith]

This looks really good! Just to make sure we don't have any regressions could you add a couple extra specs?

• Layered inheritance. So maybe a abstract class TestApiPrefixAction < TestAction and then another action ChildApiPrefixAction < TestApiPrefixAction. It could have just one route and the spec would check that it still correctly prefixed the route
• Modules. It may be helpful/common for people to make a route prefix module that is added to multiple actions. Could you create a ApiPrefix module and then an action that includes it and see if the action gets the prefix correctly?

Something like:

module ApiPrefix
  macro included
    route_prefix "/api"
  end
end

Does that make sense?

[rnice01]

This looks really good! Just to make sure we don't have any regressions could you add a couple extra specs?

• Layered inheritance. So maybe a abstract class TestApiPrefixAction < TestAction and then another action ChildApiPrefixAction < TestApiPrefixAction. It could have just one route and the spec would check that it still correctly prefixed the route
• Modules. It may be helpful/common for people to make a route prefix module that is added to multiple actions. Could you create a ApiPrefix module and then an action that includes it and see if the action gets the prefix correctly?

Something like:

module ApiPrefix
  macro included
    route_prefix "/api"
  end
end

Does that make sense?

@paulcsmith, for the Layered Inheritance spec, would the abstract class use the route_prefix macro and test the child correctly prefixes it's own routes from the parent's defined prefix?

`
abstract class ApiTestPrefixAction < TestAction
route_prefix "/api"
end

class ChildApiTestPrefixAction < ApiTestPrefixAction
get "/test" do
#make sure this gets prefixed
end
end
`

[paulcsmith]

@rnice01 Yeah that's exactly what I had in mind! 👍

[paulcsmith]

This looks fantastic! Thanks for doing this :)

[jwoertink]

oh man! Stoked for this ❤️