Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix inconsistency in javadoc for WorkflowInterface (temporalio#2232)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Adam Mackler committed Sep 22, 2024
1 parent 7525c65 commit 95fb789
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
* String d();
* }
*
* public class CImpl implements C {
* public class DImpl implements D {
* public void a() {}
* public void aa() {}
* public void b() {}
Expand All @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
* }
* </code></pre>
*
* When <code>CImpl</code> instance is registered with the {@link io.temporal.worker.Worker} the
* When <code>DImpl</code> instance is registered with the {@link io.temporal.worker.Worker} the
* following is registered:
*
* <p>
Expand All @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
* </ul>
*
* The client code can call signals through stubs to <code>B</code>, <code>C</code> and <code>D
* </code> interfaces. A call to crate a stub to <code>A</code> interface will fail as <code>A
* </code> interfaces. A call to create a stub to <code>A</code> interface will fail as <code>A
* </code> is not annotated with the WorkflowInterface.
*/
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 95fb789

Please sign in to comment.