Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft: Port HMM to pomegranate 1.0 #20

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

AKuederle
Copy link
Member

This is an attempt to port to pomegranate 1.0. Current code is not working yet, even though most of the API is ported.

In the current state, the models don't seem to get fitted, as we get a negative improvement as in the first iteration.
It could be that there are still bugs in the library itself causing this

I am also not sure, if I understood/implemented the new concept of priors correctly.

Biggest issue is that we need to retrain the old model or find some hacky way to port it to the new format.

@AKuederle AKuederle changed the title Port HMM to pomegranate 1.0 Draft: Port HMM to pomegranate 1.0 Apr 18, 2023
@AKuederle
Copy link
Member Author

It seems like I made some progress, by fixing the initial probability matrix and tweaking how priors are calculated for the training. Now at least, we don't get negative improvements and the model seems to train.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant