Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding methods for exporting #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mys721tx
Copy link
Contributor

@mys721tx mys721tx commented Dec 26, 2024

Adds a method to KeyPair and CertificateAuthority to export the certificate to an struct directly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added methods to retrieve certificates directly from CertificateAuthority and KeyPair.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced test coverage for certificate generation and validation within the test suite.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two new Cert() methods in the testcerts package for the CertificateAuthority and KeyPair structs. These methods provide direct access to the underlying X.509 certificates, allowing easier retrieval of certificate data. Accompanying test cases have been added to verify the certificate generation and validation process, ensuring that the new methods work as expected and provide the correct certificate information.

Changes

File Change Summary
testcerts.go Added Cert() method to CertificateAuthority and KeyPair structs, returning the associated X.509 certificate.
testcerts_test.go Added new test cases to verify certificate generation and validate new Cert() methods.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant CA as CertificateAuthority
    participant KP as KeyPair
    
    CA->>CA: Cert()
    CA-->>User: Returns X.509 Certificate
    
    KP->>KP: Cert()
    KP-->>User: Returns X.509 Certificate
Loading

Poem

🐰 Certificates dancing with glee,
A method to fetch them, oh so free!
Cert() arrives with a hop and a bound,
Revealing secrets that were once uncrowned.
Testing our trust with rabbity might! 🔐


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0dab7ca and b49928d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • testcerts.go (2 hunks)
  • testcerts_test.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • testcerts.go
  • testcerts_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cf4d0f and 0dab7ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • testcerts.go (2 hunks)
  • testcerts_test.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
testcerts_test.go

29-29: SA5011: possible nil pointer dereference

(staticcheck)


26-26: SA5011(related information): this check suggests that the pointer can be nil

(staticcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
testcerts.go (2)

197-201: Looks Good!

This new Cert() method on CertificateAuthority is succinct and properly returns ca.cert. The structure is straightforward, and the new public method is well-aligned with the PR objectives of enabling direct certificate retrieval.


279-283: Straightforward Implementation

Similarly, this Cert() method on KeyPair mirrors the newly added Cert() method on CertificateAuthority. The direct return of kp.cert is consistent and meets the PR objectives.

testcerts_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
testcerts_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Adds a method to KeyPair and CertificateAuthority to export the
certificate to an struct directly.
@madflojo
Copy link
Owner

@mys721tx looks great thanks for the contribution!

@madflojo madflojo merged commit d42b97f into madflojo:main Dec 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@mys721tx mys721tx deleted the export-to-ram branch December 30, 2024 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants