[WEB-2421] chore: issue display properties and issue identifier improvements. #5577
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the addition of new properties and modifications to existing interfaces and components within the codebase, primarily related to issue display properties. A new optional property, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant IssueIdentifier
participant IssueFilterHelper
participant DisplayProperties
User->>IssueIdentifier: Request Issue Details
IssueIdentifier->>DisplayProperties: Check display properties
DisplayProperties-->>IssueIdentifier: Return display properties
IssueIdentifier->>User: Render Issue Details based on properties
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-identifier.tsx (1)
Line range hint
28-42: LGTM, but fix the potential runtime error.The changes to the
IssueIdentifiercomponent are valid and enhance its flexibility in rendering based on the provided display properties.However, there is a potential issue with the derivation of
shouldRenderIssueID. AccessingdisplayProperties.keydirectly might lead to a runtime error ifdisplayPropertiesisundefined.To fix this issue, apply the following diff:
- const shouldRenderIssueID = displayProperties ? displayProperties.key : true; + const shouldRenderIssueID = displayProperties?.key ?? true;This change uses the optional chaining operator (
?.) to safely accesskeyonly ifdisplayPropertiesis defined, and the nullish coalescing operator (??) to default totrueifdisplayProperties?.keyisundefinedornull.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (15)
- packages/types/src/view-props.d.ts (1 hunks)
- web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-identifier.tsx (4 hunks)
- web/ce/helpers/issue-filter.helper.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/calendar/base-calendar-root.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/calendar/issue-block.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/filters/header/display-filters/display-filters-selection.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/filters/header/display-filters/display-properties.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/gantt/base-gantt-root.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/gantt/blocks.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/block.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/block.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/spreadsheet/issue-row.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/constants/issue.ts (14 hunks)
- web/ee/helpers/issue-filter.helper.ts (1 hunks)
- web/helpers/issue.helper.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/ee/helpers/issue-filter.helper.ts
Additional context used
Biome
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/filters/header/display-filters/display-properties.tsx
[error] 34-34: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Additional comments not posted (29)
web/ce/helpers/issue-filter.helper.ts (2)
4-8: LGTM!The
TShouldRenderDisplayPropertytype is correctly defined and serves its purpose.
10-18: LGTM, but please clarify the special handling ofissue_type.The function is correctly implemented but it's not clear why
issue_typeis being handled differently. This might lead to confusion in the future.Please provide more context on why
issue_typeis being treated differently and if there are plans to handle other keys in a similar manner in the future. This will help maintain clarity in the codebase.web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-identifier.tsx (1)
13-13: LGTM!The addition of the
displayPropertiesproperty to theTIssueIdentifierBasePropstype is a valid change that enables theIssueIdentifiercomponent to receive display configurations related to issue properties.web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/filters/header/display-filters/display-properties.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM!The addition of the
displayPropertiesToRenderprop to thePropstype is a valid change that allows theFilterDisplayPropertiescomponent to specify which display properties should be rendered.
22-47: LGTM!The changes to the
FilterDisplayPropertiescomponent are valid and enhance its ability to manage display properties dynamically based on the provided parameters and theshouldRenderDisplayPropertyfunction. The use of theuseParamshook improves the component's integration with routing.Tools
Biome
[error] 34-34: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/gantt/blocks.tsx (3)
10-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
86-87: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
110-110: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/filters/header/display-filters/display-filters-selection.tsx (2)
53-53: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
57-57: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/gantt/base-gantt-root.tsx (1)
31-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
packages/types/src/view-props.d.ts (1)
130-130: LGTM!The addition of the optional
issue_typeproperty to theIIssueDisplayPropertiesinterface is a good change that enhances the flexibility of managing issue display properties while maintaining backward compatibility.web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/calendar/base-calendar-root.tsx (1)
22-24: LGTM!Exporting the
CalendarStoreTypetype is a good change that improves the modularity of the code by enabling the type to be imported and utilized in other parts of the application.web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/calendar/issue-block.tsx (4)
15-15: LGTM!Importing the
useIssueshook is a good change that allows the component to access a broader set of issue-related data.
16-16: LGTM!Importing the
useIssueStoreTypehook is a good change that provides a specific type for the calendar store, enhancing type safety and clarity.
46-47: LGTM!Initializing the
storeTypevariable usinguseIssueStoreType()and retrievingissuesFilterfrom theuseIssueshook usingstoreTypeare good changes that allow for dynamic updates to the displayed properties of issues based on the current filter state. These changes improve the component's ability to manage and display issues in a calendar layout.
110-110: LGTM!Passing the
displayPropertiesfromissuesFilter.issueFiltersto theIssueIdentifiercomponent is a good change that likely alters how issue details are rendered, making the display more responsive to the current filter settings. This change enhances the component's functionality and is consistent with the existing code.web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/block.tsx (1)
64-72: LGTM!The changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The component structure is simplified by eliminating the
WithDisplayPropertiesHOChigher-order component (HOC).- The
displayPropertiesare now directly passed to theIssueIdentifiercomponent, which preserves the core functionality of displaying issue details.web/helpers/issue.helper.ts (1)
308-308: LGTM!The changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The addition of the
issue_typeparameter enhances thegetComputedDisplayPropertiesfunction's capability to handle an additional aspect of display properties related to issue types.- The default value for
issue_typeis derived from thedisplayPropertiesobject using the nullish coalescing operator, which ensures a sensible default value.web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/block.tsx (3)
129-129: LGTM!The changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The modification to the
keyMinWidthcalculation enhances the component's responsiveness to thedisplayPropertiesstate.- The UI adapts based on the available data, potentially improving user experience.
187-187: LGTM!The changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The updated rendering logic for the
divthat displays the issue identifier improves the flexibility of the UI.- The UI can now display relevant information based on additional properties, such as
displayProperties.issue_type.
194-194: LGTM!The changes are approved for the following reasons:
- Passing the
displayPropertiesto theIssueIdentifiercomponent is consistent with the updated rendering logic for thedivthat displays the issue identifier.web/core/constants/issue.ts (4)
111-128: LGTM!The new constant
ISSUE_DISPLAY_PROPERTIES_KEYSis a useful addition that centralizes the keys of theIIssueDisplayPropertiesinterface. This can improve code maintainability and reduce duplication when referencing these keys in other parts of the codebase.
134-135: LGTM!The new display properties "key" (representing the issue ID) and "issue_type" (representing the type of the issue) are correctly added to the
ISSUE_DISPLAY_PROPERTIESarray.
208-208: LGTM!The
display_propertiesproperty in theISSUE_DISPLAY_FILTERS_BY_LAYOUTobject is consistently updated to use theISSUE_DISPLAY_PROPERTIES_KEYSconstant across multiple layouts. This change aligns with the updated type ofdisplay_propertiesin theILayoutDisplayFiltersOptionsinterface and ensures that all the defined issue display properties are used uniformly across the layouts.Also applies to: 221-221, 247-247, 272-272, 285-285, 310-310, 332-332, 357-357, 382-382, 407-407, 430-430, 454-454
189-189: LGTM, but verify the usage ofdisplay_properties.The change to the
display_propertiesproperty in theILayoutDisplayFiltersOptionsinterface is approved. It now accepts an array of keys from theIIssueDisplayPropertiesinterface, allowing for more granular control over the displayed properties in different layouts.However, ensure that this change is thoroughly tested and that all usages of
display_propertieshave been updated to match the new type.Run the following script to verify the usage of
display_properties:Verification successful
Verification Successful:
display_propertiesUsage Updated CorrectlyThe usage of
display_propertiesthroughout the codebase is consistent with its new type as an array of keys fromIIssueDisplayProperties. No instances of it being used as a boolean or set totruewere found, confirming that the codebase has been updated correctly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `display_properties` match the new type. # Test: Search for the usage of `display_properties`. Expect: No occurrences of `display_properties: boolean` or `display_properties: true`. rg --type typescript $'display_properties:\s*(boolean|true)'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `display_properties` match the new type. # Test: Search for the usage of `display_properties`. Expect: No occurrences of `display_properties: boolean` or `display_properties: true`. rg $'display_properties:\s*(boolean|true)'Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `display_properties` is used as an array of keys from `IIssueDisplayProperties`. # Test: Search for the usage of `display_properties` to ensure it is used as an array. rg $'display_properties:\s*\[\]'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `display_properties` to verify its usage in different contexts. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `display_properties`. rg 'display_properties'Length of output: 9420
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/spreadsheet/issue-row.tsx (3)
224-226: LGTM!The calculation for
keyMinWidthis updated to conditionally check for the presence of thekeydisplay property. WhendisplayProperties.keyis defined, the minimum width is calculated based on the length of the project identifier to ensure proper spacing. If thekeyproperty is not available, the minimum width defaults to0. This change enhances the flexibility of the component by adapting its layout based on the available display properties.
284-284: LGTM!The rendering logic is updated to conditionally render elements based on the presence of either the
keyorissue_typedisplay property. This change allows the component to adapt its rendering based on the provided display properties, improving its flexibility and responsiveness.
292-292: LGTM!The
displayPropertiesare now directly passed as a prop to theIssueIdentifiercomponent. This change ensures that the relevant display properties are available to theIssueIdentifiercomponent, allowing it to render the issue identifier based on the provided properties. This streamlines the component's structure and improves its responsiveness to the display properties.
| const [previewEnabled, setPreviewEnabled] = React.useState(true); | ||
| // derived values | ||
| const projectId = !!routerProjectId ? routerProjectId?.toString() : undefined; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the redundant double-negation.
The static analysis tool correctly points out that the double-negation at line 34 is redundant and can be safely removed without changing the behavior of the code.
Apply the following diff to fix the issue:
- const projectId = !!routerProjectId ? routerProjectId?.toString() : undefined;
+ const projectId = routerProjectId?.toString() ?? undefined;This change uses the nullish coalescing operator (??) to provide the fallback value of undefined if routerProjectId?.toString() evaluates to undefined or null.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const projectId = !!routerProjectId ? routerProjectId?.toString() : undefined; | |
| const projectId = routerProjectId?.toString() ?? undefined; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 34-34: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
issue_typeproperty for enhanced issue display flexibility.displayPropertiesto theIssueIdentifiercomponent for dynamic rendering.Enhancements
display_propertiesmanagement from boolean to an array of keys for greater configurability.Refactor
Bug Fixes