-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: updated powered by #6160
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
space/app/views/[anchor]/layout.tsx (1)
6-6
: Consider adding margin/padding for better spacingThe PoweredBy component might benefit from some spacing to prevent it from being too close to the content above.
- <PoweredBy /> + <div className="mt-4"> + <PoweredBy /> + </div>Also applies to: 53-53
space/app/issues/[anchor]/client-layout.tsx (1)
6-6
: LGTM with a minor suggestionThe PoweredBy component placement and fragment usage are appropriate. Consider using the shorthand fragment syntax when no props are needed.
- <> + <React.Fragment> <div className="relative flex h-screen min-h-[500px] w-screen flex-col overflow-hidden"> {/* ... */} </div> <PoweredBy /> - </> + </React.Fragment>Also applies to: 47-55
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
space/app/issues/[anchor]/client-layout.tsx
(2 hunks)space/app/views/[anchor]/layout.tsx
(2 hunks)space/app/views/[anchor]/page.tsx
(2 hunks)space/core/components/account/user-logged-in.tsx
(2 hunks)space/core/components/views/auth.tsx
(2 hunks)space/core/lib/instance-provider.tsx
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
space/app/views/[anchor]/page.tsx (1)
5-6
: LGTM! Clean addition of PoweredBy component
The PoweredBy component has been properly integrated without affecting the existing functionality.
Also applies to: 29-34
space/core/components/account/user-logged-in.tsx (1)
7-7
: Verify layout overflow with PoweredBy component
The parent container uses h-screen
which might cause content overflow or scrolling issues when the PoweredBy component is added. Consider adjusting the layout to ensure proper content fitting.
Consider this alternative layout structure:
- <div className="flex flex-col h-screen w-screen">
+ <div className="flex flex-col min-h-screen w-screen">
Also applies to: 49-49
space/core/components/views/auth.tsx (1)
10-10
: LGTM: PoweredBy component placement is appropriate
The PoweredBy component is correctly imported and placed at the bottom of the layout, outside the main content area but within the root container. This placement is consistent with the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 44-44
space/core/lib/instance-provider.tsx (1)
11-11
: LGTM: Simplified InstanceProvider by removing PoweredBy
The removal of PoweredBy from InstanceProvider makes the component more focused on its core responsibility. This change aligns with moving the PoweredBy component to specific layout components.
Let's verify that PoweredBy is consistently placed in all necessary layout components:
Also applies to: 71-71
✅ Verification successful
PoweredBy component is now correctly placed in layout components
The verification shows that the PoweredBy component has been properly relocated from InstanceProvider to specific layout components:
space/app/views/[anchor]/layout.tsx
space/app/issues/[anchor]/client-layout.tsx
space/app/views/[anchor]/page.tsx
The component is also consistently used in authentication-related views:
space/core/components/views/auth.tsx
space/core/components/account/user-logged-in.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PoweredBy component placement across layout components
# Search for PoweredBy imports and usage
echo "Checking PoweredBy usage across layout components..."
rg -l "PoweredBy" --type tsx
# Search for layout components that might need PoweredBy
echo "\nChecking potential layout components that might need PoweredBy..."
rg -l "Layout.*=.*observer" --type tsx
Length of output: 385
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restriction since tsx might not be recognized
# First, find all potential layout and page files
echo "Finding layout and page files..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx -e js | grep -i "layout\|page"
# Then search for PoweredBy usage
echo -e "\nChecking PoweredBy usage..."
rg "PoweredBy"
# Also check for specific imports from components
echo -e "\nChecking specific imports of PoweredBy..."
rg "import.*PoweredBy.*from.*components"
Length of output: 29784
* modifed action and install.sh for selfhost * updated selfhost readme and install.sh * fixes * changes suggested by code-rabbit * chore: updated powered by (#6160) * improvement: update fetch map during workspace-level module fetch to reduce redundant API calls (#6159) * fix: remove unwanted states fetching logic to avoid multiple API calls. (#6158) * chore remove unnecessary CTA (#6161) * fix: build branch workflow upload artifacts * fixes * changes suggested by code-rabbit * modifed action and install.sh for selfhost * updated selfhost readme and install.sh * fix: build branch workflow upload artifacts * fixes * changes suggested by code-rabbit --------- Co-authored-by: guru_sainath <gurusainath007@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Prateek Shourya <prateekshourya29@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <71900764+rahulramesha@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sriram veeraghanta <veeraghanta.sriram@gmail.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
PoweredBy
component across various layouts, enhancing the visual presentation of the application.Bug Fixes
PoweredBy
component from theInstanceProvider
, ensuring cleaner component structure without affecting functionality.These updates improve the overall user experience by providing consistent branding and visual elements throughout the application.