Skip to content

Security: manhtukhang/vault-plugin-secrets-nexus-repository

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

This document includes information about the vulnerability reporting, patch, release, and disclosure processes, as well as general security posture.

Supported Versions

The following versions are currently supported and receive security updates. Release candidates will not receive security updates.

Version Supported
>= 0.0.1

Reporting a Vulnerability

We're extremely grateful for security researchers and users that report vulnerabilities to us. All reports are thoroughly investigated by the project security team.

Vulnerabilities are reported privately via GitHub's Security Advisories feature. Please use the following link to submit your vulnerability: Report a vulnerability

Please see Privately reporting a security vulnerability for more information on how to submit a vulnerability using GitHub's interface.

When Should I Report a Vulnerability?

  • You think you discovered a potential security vulnerability in vault-plugin-secrets-nexus-repository
  • You are unsure how a vulnerability affects vault-plugin-secrets-nexus-repository
  • You think you discovered a vulnerability in another project that vault-plugin-secrets-nexus-repository depends on
    • For projects with their own vulnerability reporting and disclosure process, please report it directly there

When Should I NOT Report a Vulnerability?

  • You need help tuning GitHub Actions for security
  • You need help applying security related updates
  • Your issue is not security related

Vulnerability Response

Each report is acknowledged and analyzed by the Security Team within 14 days. This will set off the Security Release Process.

Any vulnerability information shared with the Security Team stays within vault-plugin-secrets-nexus-repository project and will not be disseminated to other projects unless it is necessary to get the issue fixed.

As the security issue moves from triage, to identified fix, to release planning we will keep the reporter updated.

Security Release & Disclosure Process

Security vulnerabilities should be handled quickly and sometimes privately. The primary goal of this process is to reduce the total time users are vulnerable to publicly known exploits.

Private Disclosure

We ask that all suspected vulnerabilities be privately and responsibly disclosed via the private disclosure process outlined above.

Fixes may be developed and tested by the Security Team in a temporary private fork that are private from the general public if deemed necessary.

Public Disclosure

Vulnerabilities are disclosed publicly as GitHub Security Advisories.

A public disclosure date is negotiated by the Security Team and the bug submitter. We prefer to fully disclose the bug as soon as possible once a user mitigation is available. It is reasonable to delay disclosure when the bug or the fix is not yet fully understood, the solution is not well-tested, or for vendor coordination. The timeframe for disclosure is from immediate (especially if it's already publicly known) to several weeks. For a vulnerability with a straightforward mitigation, we expect report date to disclosure date to be on the order of 14 days.

If you know of a publicly disclosed security vulnerability please IMMEDIATELY report the vulnerability to inform the Security Team about the vulnerability so they may start the patch, release, and communication process.

If possible the Security Team will ask the person making the public report if the issue can be handled via a private disclosure process. If the reporter denies the request, the Security Team will move swiftly with the fix and release process. In extreme cases you can ask GitHub to delete the issue but this generally isn't necessary and is unlikely to make a public disclosure less damaging.

Security Releases

Once a fix is available it will be released and announced via the project on GitHub. Security releases will announced and clearly marked as a security release and include information on which vulnerabilities were fixed. As much as possible this announcement should be actionable, and include any mitigating steps users can take prior to upgrading to a fixed version.

Fixes will be applied in patch releases to all supported versions and all fixed vulnerabilities will be noted in the CHANGELOG.

Severity

The Security Team evaluates vulnerability severity on a case-by-case basis, guided by CVSS 3.1.

Security Posture

We aim to reduce the number of security issues through several general security-concious development practices including the use of unit-tests, end-to-end (e2e) tests, static and dynamic analysis tools, and use of memory-safe languages.

We aim to fix issues discovered by analysis tools as quickly as possible. We prefer to add these tools to "pre-submit" checks on PRs so that issues are never added to the code in the first place.

In general, we observe the following security-conscious practices during development (This is not an exhaustive list).

  • All PRs are reviewed by at least one CODEOWNER.
  • All tests must pass before a PRs is merged.
  • We refrain from using memory-unsafe languages (e.g. C, C++) or memory-unsafe use of languages that are memory-safe by default (e.g. the Go unsafe package).

Security Team

The Security Team is responsible for the overall security of the project and for reviewing reported vulnerabilities. Each member is familiar with designing secure software, security issues related to CI/CD, GitHub Actions and build provenance.

Security Team:

  • Tu KhangManh (@manhtukhang)

Security Team membership is currently considered on a case-by-case basis.

Security Policy Updates

Changes to this Security Policy are reviewed and approved by the Security Team.

There aren’t any published security advisories