Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow edits to popup container class while the popup is not on the map #10889
Allow edits to popup container class while the popup is not on the map #10889
Changes from all commits
4bd9639
4b98354
1e2f063
c523598
051be6b
646002a
bca4cfb
aba074b
774d41e
f67bb87
0c3349e
da5268b
acfa889
5d7b61d
b9e20fa
fd70ead
aa89bc2
3e0a353
745581b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Is there a reason for inverting the conditional? Early return can be nice to de-nest code when otherwise equivalent. Nothing blocking here for me though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking was to remove the early return allowing
this. _updateClassList()
to be called in any condition. I realize there's another call inside here, I'll double-check and see if I can remove that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup it was redundant! (Oops) Fixed in latest commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seemed like a strange case for recursion here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe I've seen this style, especially in the symbol code, where it runs modified values through a different branch of the same function, but TBH I find it slightly hard to follow, so that if otherwise equivalent, I prefer your change 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since DOM is no longer directly updated, these functions no longer throw an error.