Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configurable hash #8596 #8603
Configurable hash #8596 #8603
Changes from 2 commits
d70a323
15c8213
c2f953f
e713cfa
533dd54
b361f3a
5a1a710
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: can we just move this block into the
else
statement on line 74 to avoid checkingmapFeedback
a second time?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is hardly possible, as we need
bearing
andpitch
to be added to hash if needed. By the way,mapFeedback
is not well documented so I don't understand if I need to take it into account whenhashName
is set.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It appears that you can remove the
!mapFeedback
part of this check entirely without causing any issues. I'm not entirely sure what the variable is for, but this is the only reference I can find for it in the code base and it looks like it's pretty much alwaystrue
if there's a hash.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need the
|| ''
part here? If there's no hash name, then shouldn't we skip the=
as well?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
test-flow
fails without this, see https://circleci.com/gh/mapbox/mapbox-gl-js/50268There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can get around this by assigning
this._hashName
to a variable at the top of the if statement and then changing the two references tothis._hashName
to the variable. That lets us get rid of the unnecessary and confusing|| ''
part of this while keeping Flow happy.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add a comment on this just to make it a little easier to grasp at a quick glance?