Code of conduct #1094
Code of conduct #1094
Conversation
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Outdated
| ## Practices | ||
|
|
||
| - **Final doesn't exist:** It is assumed that each of us is working to the best of their ability to make Marked better using the knowledge and skills we each have at the time. | ||
| - **Perfection is the unattainable goal:** The long we wait to make something perfect, the longer our users have to wait for the features and functionality the want and need to be delighted with Marked. Having said that, we will always strive to continuously improve in all areass. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
areass should probably be areas
Maybe run this through a spell check first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lol - Fair. Was mainly throwing it up here to see what y'all wanted to add; or, if y'all thought these were not worth having. Updated title to be more explicit of where the PR is, sorry about that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be easiest to grab an existing code of conduct and remove anything we don't agree with. That's what GitHub recommends:
Wherever you can, use prior art. The Contributor Covenant is a drop-in code of conduct that is used by over 40,000 open source projects, including Kubernetes, Rails, and Swift.
The Django Code of Conduct and the Citizen Code of Conduct are also two good code of conduct examples.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I saw that recommendation as well - and think it may be a good one.
Under normal circumstances, I would facilitate a gathering where we actually talked about this stuff - good team building exercise - it just so happens to wind up with cultural norms at the end.
Thought this might be a good alternative and give us a chance to actually build something together as a team, which I suppose removing things might cover as well.
Which one do you think is a better for us to start with??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which of the two mentioned in the quote...??
(I also tend toward the 8fold one, which is why I picked the format, I prefer it over legalize or dry one, you know? Don't want it to be milquetoast, of course, I guess that's really up to the contributors in the end.)
Anyway...probably not focused enough on it to really take in all the potential impacts before feeling comfortable taking action.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 8fold about page doesn't look like a code of conduct.
How about the node.js CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md?
It's basically copied from contributor-covenant.org.
After all, this is a project that runs on node.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, the 8fold one emphasizes the concept of culture all around as opposed to "thou shalt do this and not do that". But, it could be odd for people accustomed to the other type. I do appreciate the NodeJS one and don't have anything that I would fundamentally disagree with.
|
I agree with the idea of modifying an existing code of conduct. We can save time that way and get started on the long list of issues. |
|
Updated using the NodeJS base. Added section at top: Our North Star. Just a recommendation. @styfle: Passing final decision making authority to you, brother. |
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Outdated
| version 1.4, available at [http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4][version] | ||
|
|
||
| ## Appendix A: The report@nodejs.org Alias |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably remove this appendix since its specific to node
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed. Do you want to merge and takeover; or, I think you can work directly in the PR by hitting the "open this in GitHub Desktop"...?? Or, start a new PR and close?? I should probably catch up on the day job before they notice I'm missing...luckily they know this work is helping them too. ;)
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| [Moderation Policy]: https://github.com/nodejs/admin/blob/master/Moderation-Policy.md#moderation-policy | ||
| [Requesting Moderation]: https://github.com/nodejs/admin/blob/master/Moderation-Policy.md#requesting-moderation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should these documents be created?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmmmm...didn't notice those. If the links are there - probably - having said that, I don't know if we're that far along and I'm thinking the changes to the AUTHORS page might help?? Think they can be removed for now, to be honest.
Add initial code of conduct similar to Node.js
Marked version: 0.3.17
We're still setting up the community things related to bringing Marked back to life.
See GitHub recommendations on open source projects, specifically the CODE_OF_CONDUCT
As a contributor, what else do you think should be included here? (Use review functionality?? And comments.)