Package website: release | development
The optmatch package implements the optimal full matching algorithm for bipartite matching problems. Given a matrix describing the distances between two groups (where one group is represented by row entries, and the other by column entries), the algorithm finds a matching between units that minimizes the average within grouped distances. This algorithm is a popular choice for covariate balancing applications (e.g. propensity score matching), but it also can be useful for design stage applications such as blocking. For more on the application and its implementation, see:
Hansen, B.B. and Klopfer, S.O. (2006) Optimal full matching and
related designs via network flows, JCGS 15 609-627.
optmatch is available on CRAN:
> install.packages("optmatch")
> library("optmatch")
There are two different packages implementing the actual solver which can be used.
- The default, starting in 0.10.0, is the LEMON graph library's Min Cost Flow solver, implemented in the rlemon package.
- In previous versions, the default was the RELAX-IV solver, which is now implemented in the rrelaxiv package.
Users wishing to utilize the RELAX-IV solver must install rrelaxiv separately, see that page for details. Once installed, RELAX-IV becomes the default solver.
The LEMON solver has four separate algorithms implemented, Cycle Cancelling (the
default), Network Simplex, Cost Scaling, and Capacity Scaling. Each has its own
trade-offs and performance quirks. See help(fullmatch)
for details of how to
choose which is being used.
In addition to the optimal full matching algorithm, the package contains useful functions for generating distance specifications, combining and editing distance specifications, and summarizing and displaying matches. This walk through shows how to use these tools in your matching workflow.
Before we start, let's generate some simulated data. We will have two groups,
the "treated" and "control" groups. Without our knowledge, nature assigned
units from a pool into one of these two groups. The probability of being a
treated unit depends on some covariates. In the vector Z
, let a 1 denote
treated units and 0 denote control units
set.seed(20120111) # set this to get the exact same answers as I do
n <- 26 # chosen so we can divide the alphabet in half
W <- data.frame(w1 = rbeta(n, 4, 2), w2 = rbinom(n, 1, p = .33))
# nature assigns to treatment
tmp <- numeric(n)
tmp[sample(1:n, prob = W$w1^(1 + W$w2), size = n/2)] <- 1
W$z <- tmp
# for convenience, let's give the treated units capital letter names
tmp <- character(n)
tmp[W$z == 1] <- LETTERS[1:(n/2)]
tmp[W$z == 0] <- letters[(26 - n/2 + 1):26]
rownames(W) <- tmp
As we can see with a simple table and plot, these groups are not balanced on the covariates, as they would be (in expectation) with a randomly assigned treatment.
table(W$w2, W$z)
library(lattice) ; densityplot(W$w1, groups = W$z)
The next steps use the covariates to pair up similar treated and control
units. For more on assessing the amount and severity of imbalance between
groups on observed covariates, see the
RItools R
package.
These two groups are different, but how different are individual treated units from individual control units? In answering this question, we will produce several distance specifications: matrices of treated units (rows) by control units (columns) with entries denoting distances. optmatch provides several ways of generating these matrices so that you don't have to do it by hand.
Let's begin with a simple Euclidean distance on the space defined by W
:
distances <- list()
distances$euclid <- match_on(z ~ w1 + w2, data = W, method = "euclidean")
The method
argument tells the match_on
function how to compute the
distances over the space defined by the formula. The default method extends the
simple Euclidean distance by rescaling the distances by the covariance of the
variables, the Mahalanobis
distance:
distances$mahal <- match_on(z ~ w1 + w2, data = W)
You can write additional distance computation functions. See the documentation
for match_on
for more details on how to create these functions.
To create distances, we could also try regressing the treatment indicator on
the covariates and computing the difference distance for each treated and
control pair. To make this process easier, match_on
has methods for glm
objects (and for big data problems, bigglm
objects):
propensity.model <- glm(z ~ w1 + w2, data = W, family =
binomial())
distances$propensity <- match_on(propensity.model)
The glm
method is a wrapper around the numeric
method for match_on
. The
numeric
method takes a vector of scores (for example, the linear prediction
for each unit from the model) and a vector indicating treatment status (z
)
for each unit. This method returns the absolute difference between each
treated and control pair on their scores (additionally,
the glm
method rescales the data before invoking the numeric
method). If
you wish to fit a "caliper" to your distance matrix, a hard limit on allowed
distances between treated and control units, you can pass a caliper
argument, a scalar numeric value. Any treated and control pair that is larger
than the caliper value will be replaced by Inf
, an unmatchable value. The
caliper
argument also applies to glm
method. Calipers are covered in more
detail in the next section.
The final convenience method of match_on
is using an arbitrary function. This
function is probably most useful for advanced users of optmatch. See the
documentation of the match_on
function for more details on how to write your
own arbitrary computation functions.
We have created several representations of the matching problem, using Euclidean distance, Mahalanobis distance, the estimated propensity score, and an arbitrary function. We can combine these distances into single metric using standard arithmetic functions:
distances$all <- with(distances, euclid + mahal + propensity)
You may find it convenient to work in smaller pieces at first and then stitch
the results together into a bigger distance. The rbind
and cbind
functions let us
add additional treated and control entries to a distance specification for
each of the existing control and treated units, respectively. For example, we
might want to combine a Mahalanobis score for units n
through s
with a
propensity score for units t
through z
:
W.n.to.s <- W[c(LETTERS[1:13], letters[14:19]),]
W.t.to.z <- W[c(LETTERS[1:13], letters[20:26]),]
mahal.n.to.s <- match_on(z ~ w1 + w2, data = W.n.to.s)
ps.t.to.z <- match_on(glm(z ~ w1 + w2, data = W.t.to.z, family = binomial()))
distances$combined <- cbind(mahal.n.to.s, ps.t.to.z)
The exactMatch
function creates "stratified" matching problems, in which
there are subgroups that are completely separate. Such matching problems are
often much easier to solve than problems where a treated unit could be
connected to any control unit.
There is another method for creating reduced matching problems. The caliper
function compares each entry in an existing distance specification and
disallows any that are larger than a specified value. For example, we can trim
our previous combined distance to anything smaller than the median value:
distances$median.caliper <- caliper(distances$all, median(distances$all))
distances$all.trimmed <- with(distances, all + median.caliper)
Like the exactMatch
function, the results of caliper
used the sparse
matrix representation mentioned above, so can be very efficient for large,
sparse problems. As noted previously, if using the glm
or numeric
methods
of match_on
, passing the caliper's width in the caliper
argument can be more
efficient.
In addition to the space advantages of only storing the finite entries in a
sparse matrix, the results of exactMatch
and caliper
can be used to speed
up computation of new distances. The match_on
function that we saw earlier
has an argument called within
that helps filter the resulting
computation to only the finite entries in the within
matrix. Since exactMatch
and caliper
use finite entries denote valid pairs, they make excellent sources of
the within
argument.
Instead of creating the entire Euclidean distance matrix and then filtering
out cross-strata matches, we use the results of exactMatch
to compute only
the interesting cases:
tmp <- exactMatch(z ~ w2, data = W)
distances$exact <- match_on(z ~ w1, data = W, within = tmp)
Users of previous versions of optmatch may notice that the within
argument is similar to the old structure.formula
argument. Like
within
, structure.formula
focused distance on within strata pairs.
Unlike structure.formula
, the within
argument allows using any
distance specification as an argument, including those created with caliper
. For
example, here is the Mahalanobis distance computed only for units that differ
by less than one on the propensity score.
distances$mahal.trimmed <- match_on(z ~ w1 + w2, data = W,
within = match_on(propensity.model, caliper = 1))
Now that we have generated several distances specifications, let's put them to use. Here is the simplest way to evaluate all distances specifications:
matches <- lapply(distances, function(x) { fullmatch(x, data = W) })
The result of the matching process is a named factor, where the names
correspond to the units (both treated and control) and the levels of the
factors are the matched groups. Including the data
argument is highly
recommended. This argument will make sure that the result of fullmatch
will
be in the same order as the original data.frame
that was used to build the
distance specification. This will make appending the results of fullmatch
on to the original data.frame
much more convenient.
The fullmatch
function as several arguments for fine tuning the allowed
ratio of treatment to control units in a match, and how much of the pool to
throw away as unmatchable. One common pattern for these arguments are pairs:
one treated to one control unit. Not every distance specification is amendable
to this pattern (e.g. when there are more treated units than control units in
exactMatch
created stratum). However, it can be done with the Mahalanobis
distance matrix we created earlier:
mahal.match <- pairmatch(distances$mahal, data = W)
Like fullmatch
, pairmatch
also allows fine tuning the ratio of matches to
allow larger groupings. It is can be helpful as it computes what percentage of
the group to throw away, giving better odds of successfully finding a matching
solution.
Once one has generated a match, you may wish to view the results. The results
of calls to fullmatch
or pairmatch
produce optmatch objects (specialized
factors). This object has a special option to the print
method which groups
the units by factor level:
print(mahal.match, grouped = T)
If you wish to join the match factor back to the original data.frame
:
W.matched <- cbind(W, matches = mahal.match)
Make sure to include the data
argument to fullmatch
or pairmatch
,
otherwise results are not guaranteed to be in the same order as your original
data.frame
or matrix
.
This section will help you get the latest development version of optmatch and start using the latest features. Before starting, you should know which branch you wish to install. Currently, the "master" branch is the main code base. Additional features are added in their own branches. A list of branches is available at (the optmatch project page)[https://github.com/markmfredrickson/optmatch].
You may need additional compilers as distributed by CRAN: OS X, Windows.
We recommend using dev_mode
from the devtools
package to install
in-development version of the package so that you can keep the current CRAN
version as the primary package. Activating dev_mode
creates a secondary
library of packages which can only be accessed while in dev_mode
. Packages
normally installed can still be used, but if different versions are installed
normally and in dev_mode
, the dev_mode
version takes precedent if in
dev_mode
.
Install and load the devtools
package:
> install.packages("devtools")
> library("devtools")
Activate dev_mode
:
> dev_mode()
d>
Note that the prompt changes from >
to d>
to let you know you're in
dev_mode
. Now choose the development branch you want to use. To install
master
:
d> install_github("markmfredrickson/optmatch")
Either way, the package is then loaded in the usual fashion, provided you're
still in dev_mode
:
d> library(optmatch)
Once you've done this you can disable dev_mode
as follows
d> dev_mode()
>
The development version of the package remains loaded.
Note that if you load the package -- ie, enter library(optmatch)
(when the
package hasn't already been loaded otherwise) -- while not in dev_mode
, then
you'll get whatever version of the package may be installed in your library
tree, not this development version.
If you want to switch between versions of optmatch, we suggest re-starting R.
You may use RStudio to develop for optmatch, by opening the optmatch.Rproj
file. We suggest you ensure all required dependencies are installed by running
devtools::install_deps(dependencies = TRUE)
We prefer changes that include unit tests demonstrating the problem or showing
how the new feature should be added. The test suite uses the
testthat package to write and run tests.
(Please ensure you have the latest version of testthat (or at least v0.11.0),
as older versions stored the tests in a different directory, and may not
test properly.) See the tests/testthat
directory for examples. You can run
the test suite via Build -> Test Package.
New features should include inline Roxygen documentation.
You can generate all .Rd
documents from the Roxygen
code using Build ->
Document.
Finally, you can use Build -> Build and Reload or Build -> Clean and Rebuild to load an updated version of optmatch in your current RStudio session. Alternatively, to install the developed version permanently, use Build -> Build Binary Version, followed by
install.packages("../optmatch_VERSION.tgz", repo=NULL)
You can revert back to the current CRAN version by
remove.packages("optmatch")
install.packages("optmatch")
Note: If you are building for release on CRAN, you need to ensure vignettes are compacted. This should be enabled automatically in the .Rproj file, but if not see this stackoverflow answer for some concerns about dealing with this with RStudio.
If you prefer not to use RStudio, you can develop using Make.
make test
: Run the full test suite.make document
: Update all documentation from Roxygen inline comments.make interactive
: Start up an interactive session with optmatch loaded. (make interactive-emacs
will start the session inside emacs.)make check
: RunR CMD check
on the packagemake build
: Build a binary package.make vignette
: Builds any vignettes invignettes/
directorymake clean
: Removes files built bymake vignette
,make document
ormake check
. Should not be generally necessary, but can be useful for debugging.make release
: Starts an interactive R session to submit a release to CRAN.
When your change is ready, make a pull request on github.