Solution #1629
Solution #1629
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 😊 While your code meets most of the task requirements, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it:
-
Key Handling: The code assumes that keys like
wifeandhusbandwill always correspond to valid names in thePerson.peopledictionary. This can lead toKeyErrorexceptions if the assumption is incorrect. Please ensure that the input data is validated or handle these exceptions appropriately. -
Class Variable Usage: The
peopledictionary is currently defined as a class variable, which means it is shared across all instances of thePersonclass. If this shared behavior is not intended, consider using an instance variable instead to avoid potential issues. -
Variable Naming: The variable name
peoplesis misleading as it suggests a plural form. Renaming it to something likeperson_datawould better reflect its purpose and improve code readability.
Addressing these issues will enhance the robustness and clarity of your code. Keep up the great work, and I look forward to your revised submission! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
| @@ -1,8 +1,21 @@ | |||
| class Person: | |||
| # write your code here | |||
| pass | |||
| people = {} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The people dictionary is defined as a class variable. This means it will be shared across all instances of the Person class. If this is not the intended behavior, consider using an instance variable instead.
app/main.py
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def create_person_list(people: list) -> list: | ||
| # write your code here | ||
| pass | ||
| for peoples in people: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable name peoples is misleading as it suggests a plural form. Consider renaming it to person_data or something similar to better reflect its purpose.
app/main.py
Outdated
| pass | ||
| for peoples in people: | ||
| Person(peoples["name"], peoples["age"]) | ||
| for peoples in people: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to line 11, the variable name peoples is misleading. Consider renaming it to person_data or something similar.
app/main.py
Outdated
| for peoples in people: | ||
| result_people = Person.people[peoples["name"]] | ||
| if "wife" in peoples and peoples["wife"] is not None: | ||
| result_people.wife = Person.people[peoples["wife"]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code assumes that the wife key in the dictionary corresponds to a valid name in the Person.people dictionary. Ensure that the input data is validated or handle potential KeyError exceptions.
app/main.py
Outdated
| result_people.wife = Person.people[peoples["wife"]] | ||
|
|
||
| if "husband" in peoples and peoples["husband"] is not None: | ||
| result_people.husband = Person.people[peoples["husband"]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to line 16, ensure that the husband key corresponds to a valid name in the Person.people dictionary to avoid KeyError exceptions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on making improvements to your code! 🎉 While there are still some critical issues to address, such as handling potential KeyError exceptions for wife and husband keys and considering the use of instance variables instead of class variables for people, your efforts are commendable. The decision to approve is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please review the comments and ensure these issues are addressed in future iterations to enhance the robustness and functionality of your code. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 💪
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| if "wife" in result and result["wife"] is not None: | ||
| result_people.wife = Person.people[result["wife"]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code assumes that the wife key will always correspond to a valid name in the Person.people dictionary. This can lead to a KeyError if the name is not found. Consider adding a check to ensure the name exists in the dictionary before accessing it.
| if result["husband"] in Person.people: | ||
| result_people.husband = Person.people[result["husband"]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While there is a check for the husband key in the Person.people dictionary, the code still assumes that the key will always correspond to a valid name. Ensure that the input data is validated or handle potential KeyError exceptions appropriately.
| @@ -1,8 +1,22 @@ | |||
| class Person: | |||
| # write your code here | |||
| pass | |||
| people = {} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The people dictionary is defined as a class variable, which means it is shared across all instances of the Person class. If this shared behavior is not intended, consider using an instance variable instead to avoid potential issues.
No description provided.