Fix regression from #1069 (mathjax/MathJax#3233, mathjax/MathJax#3234) #1101
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a regression introduced in #1069 in which primes are misplaced for
\underline{x}and give an error about double superscripts for\overline{x}and similar macros. This was du to not taking thesubsupOKproperty in account for thesemunderandmoverconstructs. We add those checks here.Also, this fixes some non-critical number/boolean issues in the base mappings and macros. It works the way it is, but the types are wrong, so we straighten that out here.
Resolves issue mathjax/MathJax#3233 and mathjax/MathJax#3234.