This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should open new 1:1 chat room after leaving the old one #9880
Should open new 1:1 chat room after leaving the old one #9880
Changes from 3 commits
d97abd9
073dab1
8650d21
32df6a6
f90ec46
0ac3db1
44c8063
e13d5cb
6b3136c
b8e5d99
6206d52
22e0b05
125df76
1aafb15
0670dfc
342b5a1
56969c5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wondering why we consider this assertion to be enough?
I've just checked, and leaving a room does not change its name, it only moves it to the
Historical
section.However this assertion checks the room name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For me, the old room is not displayed correctly anymore and doesn't show a header where the name would be:
(I can't click "join the discussion" because I am no longer in the room and can't join without being re-invited. Sure the other user then has two rooms, but that's how it is)
So I would assume that the assertion could only be fulfilled when I am in a new 1:1 room that was properly created.
Do you have something in mind on how to improve the assertion?