Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC4263: Preventing MXID enumeration via key queries #4263

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Johennes
Copy link
Contributor

@Johennes Johennes commented Feb 4, 2025

Rendered


In line with matrix-org/matrix-spec#1700, the following disclosure applies:

I am a Systems Architect at gematik, Software Engineer at Unomed, Matrix community member and former Element employee. This proposal was written and published with my gematik hat on.

@Johennes Johennes force-pushed the feature/prevent-mxid-enumeration-via-key-queries branch from 3175c4e to df66664 Compare February 4, 2025 13:23
@Johennes Johennes changed the title MSCXXXX: Preventing MXID enumeration via key queries MSC4263: Preventing MXID enumeration via key queries Feb 4, 2025
@Johennes Johennes marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2025 13:26
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec and removed kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff labels Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants