This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for stable prefixes for MSC2285: private read receipts #13273
Add support for stable prefixes for MSC2285: private read receipts #13273
Changes from 36 commits
83b7af1
01fbb6d
cafe4be
967f8ed
a9f2329
08d874d
ba20652
d18a485
8323358
404459f
57251c8
e12706c
c8cf10e
84299f6
208e97a
a7c3a1c
252146d
3cbd80b
8854e35
baa9e84
4455232
de9005f
c0b3c90
3612ceb
a37a17d
14b36a3
746351c
50bffe4
1b66814
bcdbb5d
0f498e0
660c776
b1ddf1a
3094b39
011d6d2
ee6512f
2cd29bd
89d5bd4
f0c531d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the ramifications of this change (and the ones below it) are that we might have HTTP pushed / emailed for something that was actually read using a private read receipt? Does that sound accurate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I am not sure I understand the code at hand though my thinking was that since both public and private RRs influence notifs in the same way, they should be added here. Was my thinking incorrect?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's my understanding as well. I'm trying to figure out the user-impact of fixing this bug.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK I double checked this; I think (before fixing this to look at all read receipt types) you could end up in this situation:
Good that we found it, but doesn't seem to be the end of the world!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for doing that! I've totally missed it