Skip to content

matteoferla/validation_of_venus_ddG

Repository files navigation

Benchmarks of the ∆∆G calculations in Venus

Venus does not do a full minimisation but cheats by only minimising the neighbourhood before and after introducing the variant. Therefore, it is important to assess the accuracy of Venus ddG calculations.

  • For experimental details see details
  • For the refactored code for scoring see scoring notes
  • For the refactored code for analysis see analyses notes
  • For the dataset of results see XXX.

For previous iterations and other files, see:

The dataset run were:

  • O2567
  • ProTherm-star
  • S1342

These are subsets of the ProTherm database and are aimed at being more balanced in terms of various factors. These factors differ, so refer to the original papers for details. For example, O2567 is balanced in the number of mutants of a given residues mutating to another, whereas S1342 is dominated by alanine scanning mutants. Etc. etc. etc.

Do note that the code presented in the markdown was originally on Jupyter notebooks. So there may be leftover lines that should not worry the reader (see note on extra fluff)

About

Tests to assess the accuracy of Venus ddG calculations

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published