Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add telemetry #589

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

feat: add telemetry #589

merged 23 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

Romsters
Copy link
Contributor

@Romsters Romsters commented Feb 17, 2025

What πŸ’»

  • Added telemetry

Reports:

  • node start event with cli arguments used;
  • anvil and config APIs usage;
  • panics;
  • errors propagated to main;
  • node executor failures;

Why βœ‹

  • Collect anonymous usage data

@Romsters Romsters requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2025 16:43
@Romsters Romsters changed the title Add telemetry feat: add telemetry Feb 17, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@dutterbutter dutterbutter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does someone opt-out of telemetry?

@Romsters
Copy link
Contributor Author

How does someone opt-out of telemetry?

for now only by editing/removing config file, we will add a proper way later.

@dutterbutter
Copy link
Collaborator

How does someone opt-out of telemetry?

for now only by editing/removing config file, we will add a proper way later.

Can we update readme / and docs accordingly (foundry book and official) πŸ™

@Romsters
Copy link
Contributor Author

How does someone opt-out of telemetry?

for now only by editing/removing config file, we will add a proper way later.

Can we update readme / and docs accordingly (foundry book and official) πŸ™

Done

@Romsters Romsters merged commit 323687d into main Feb 20, 2025
13 checks passed
@Romsters Romsters deleted the add-telemetry branch February 20, 2025 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants