info: add vendor and product ID and name

[julianoes]

This adds the vendor and product ID and name back.

[hamishwillee]

Is the change just because it is logical to separate product ownership from versioning? Makes sense to me.

[julianoes]

I guess it could also live in the same struct, you're right. But version is misleading for a vendor and product name.

[julianoes]

I'll merge this for now, we can always change it.

[hamishwillee]

One bugger about this develop codeline approach is that it isn't clear when the changes are available in mainline/release - so nothing to trigger me to regenerate our API ref.

[julianoes]

I vote to get rid of develop and work on master and have releases of master.

[hamishwillee]

Me too. @mrpollo any objections to getting rid of develop and using releases of master? We can always create a release branch off master or just create a tag. If we find that managing development gets tough we can always add it back in again.