Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workaround param issue with E10T #841

Merged

Conversation

byuarus
Copy link
Contributor

@byuarus byuarus commented Aug 13, 2019

Extended the workaround for the problem with E10T

Comparison type mismatch between uint8_t and uint32_t (mavlink_parameters.h:407)

…rameter type does not match the xml type.

> Comparison type mismatch between uint8_t and uint32_t (mavlink_parameters.h:407)
@julianoes
Copy link
Collaborator

@byuarus thanks 😄 . I think you'll have to run tools/fix_style.sh .

@darioxz
Copy link
Contributor

darioxz commented Aug 14, 2019

Could it be that the datatype of the camera MAVLink parameter in the definition file is wrong? Which parameter causes a problem?

@julianoes
Copy link
Collaborator

@darioxz it's a mismatch between the MAVLink param and the type documented in the xml.

@julianoes julianoes merged commit eaeb646 into mavlink:camera-params-workaround Sep 10, 2019
@julianoes
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @byuarus. I'll take care of the style fix in the other branch.

@JonasVautherin JonasVautherin changed the title workaround for the problem with E10T where the MAVLink the MAVLink pa… Workaround param issue with E10T Oct 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants