Skip to content

Demos für various topics of the LFD458 (Kubernetes for Administrators) and LFS459 (Kubernetes for Application Developers) courses by the Linux Foundation.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

maxbischoff/kubernetes-training-materials

Repository files navigation

Kubernetes Training Materials

Demos für various topics of the LFD458 (Kubernetes for Administrators) and LFS459 (Kubernetes for Application Developers) courses by the Linux Foundation.

Volumes Demo

This Demo showcases the usage of an emptyDir volume in one ore more containers. The files in volumes/ are intended to be edited incrementally to showcase the required configurations:

  1. Start with the volume-less pod as your base
  2. Add an emptyDir volume to this base and mount it: volumes/1-emptydir.yaml
  3. Apply the emptyDir pod to the cluster
  4. Exec into the pod using kubectl exec -it emptydir-demo -- sh and showcase the volume under /scratch
  5. Add a second container that mounts the emptyDir volume: volumes/2-shared.yaml
  6. Apply the shared-volume pod to the cluster
  7. Exec into the first container using kubectl exec -it shared-volumes-demo -c busybox -- sh create a file under /scratch
  8. Exec into the second container using kubectl exec -it shared-volumes-demo -c otherbox -- sh and show that file is available under /other

ConfigMap Demo

This Demo showcases how to use kubectl create to create a ConfigMap and making ConfigMap data available as envirnoment variables and volumes.

To run the demo, showcase the creation of a config file and the kubectl create command as done in configmaps/setup.sh. Then incrementally edit the base-pod from the volumes demo adding a volume, volumeMount and env section as demonstrated in configmaps/configmap-pod.yaml Then exec into the container using kubectl exec -it configmap-demo -- sh and show the mounted config files in /config and the MY_ENV_VAR environment variable.

Rolling Upgrade Demo

This Demo shows the rolling upgrade behavior of a deployment.

Before the demo apply the demo-deployment using kubectl apply -f rolling-upgrade/deployment.yaml.

To showcase the upgrade behavior, update the deployment, e.g. by running kubectl set image deployment deployment-demo busybox=busybox:latest. Then showcase the state change of the objects in the cluster using watch -n 0.1 kubectl get po,rs -l app=deployment-demo. Alternatively, you can show the events using e.g. kubectl get events -w.

There are also two alternative deployment manifests in the rolling-upgrade folder for showcasing the behavior when only setting maxSurge or maxUnavailable.

Headless Service Demo

This demo showcases how a headless Service differs from a normal clusterIp Service.

Apply the manifests in headless-service/ using kubectl apply -f headless-service.

Showcase DNS Resolution of the headless service using: kubectl exec -it client -- dig +search nginx-headless Compare this with the output of kubectl get endpoints nginx-headless and the resolution of the clusterIp Service kubernetes using kubectl exec -it client -- dig +search kubernetes.

Troubleshooting Demo

This Demo showcases various broken pods/deployments with different errors and how to investigate these errors.

Create a namespace and set your current kube-context to it using ./troubleshooting/setup.sh.

You can now apply the YAML files to create the various broken pods/deployments using kubectl apply -f troubleshooting/. The following table explains what is wrong with them and how to showcase the issue:

Resource Issue Command for Observing the Error
deployment/memory-constraints No pods appear for the deployment, because the Pod's memory limit of 800Mi is over the LimitRange's maximum of 500Mi kubectl describe rs -l app=memory-constraints -> events
pod/busybox The executed script in the pod's container "crashes" repeatedly. The logs show an "useful error message" kubetl get pod busybox -> State, kubectl logs busybox-> error message
pod/hungry The pod is stuck in Pending state, since its requests of 10 cpu and 5Ti memory don't fit on the lab nodes. kubetl describe pod hungry -> events, resource.requests
pod/nginx The pod's image nginx:1.18.7 doesn't exist, causing it to go into ImagePullBackoff kubectl describe pod nginx -> events, image
pod/sleeper The pod's nodeSelector test=missing doesn't fit any of the lab nodes, causing it to be stuck in Pending kubectl get pod sleeper -o yaml -> nodeSelector, conditions
pod/root The container has runAsNonRoot set to true but the image runs as root. kubectl describe pod root -> events, securityContext
pod/writer The container has readOnlyRootFilesystem set to true, but the script attempts to create a file. kubectl logs writer -> error message

After finishing the demo, reset the state using ./troubleshooting/teardown.sh.

Pod Affinity Demo

This demo showcases the behavior of pods with pod anti-affinities.

First, ensure your nodes are labelled with the standard kubernetes topology labels such that all nodes have the same region but different zones, e.g. by running:

kubectl label nodes topology.kubernetes.io/region=europe --all
for node in $(kubectl get nodes -o name); do kubectl label $node topology.kubernetes.io/zone=zone-$RANDOM; done

Then deploy the deployments in the pod-anti-affinities folder using kubectl apply -f pod-anti-affinities/. Finally showcase the created pods using kubectl get pods and for pending pods also show the events.

This will show:

  • Two pods of the deployment preferred-anti-affinity-demo that are successfully scheduled (since the anti-affinity only preferred the pods being placed into different regions & zones
  • Two pods of the deployment required-anti-affinity-demo of which one is stuck in pending, since the required antiAffinity would require a node in a different region to exist

Pod Spread Demo

This demo showcases scheduling behavior when using pod topology spread constraints. It assumes a two-node cluster. It is split into two parts, both using a maxSkew of 1 with different settings for whenUnsatisfiable. The demo for DoNotSchedule should be done first:

  1. Deploy the donotschedule manifest using kubectl apply -f pod-spread/topology-spread-constraints-donotschedule.yaml
  2. Show that only one pod of the demo Deployment has been scheduled with the rest being stuck in Pending state using kubectl get pods -l app=topology-spread-constraints-donotschedule-demo -o wide. The -helper pod has the purpose of blocking the whole node for the Deployment using an podAntiAffinity.
  3. Delete the helper pod using kubectl delete pod topology-spread-constraints-donotschedule-demo-helper. This "frees" the node again for scheduling Pods of the demo Deployment
  4. Show that all Pods are now scheduled, and that they are evenly distributed amongst both nodes using kubectl get po -o wide

Afterwards you can contrast this with the behavior of the ScheduleAnyway setting:

  1. Show the difference between the first and second demo e.g. by using colordiff -y pod-spread/*. The only difference between the demos are the names, the app labels (and selectors) and the whenUnsatisfiable setting
  2. Deploy the demo using kubectl apply -f pod-spread/topology-spread-constraints-scheduleanyway.yaml
  3. Show that all pods are scheduled successfully, but on the same node (since the other one is blocked by the helper) kubectl get pods -l app=topology-spread-constraints-scheduleanyway-demo -o wide
  4. Delete all demo pods and show that in the "good" case (where no node is blocked) pods are distributed equally between nodes using kubectl delete po topology-spread-constraints-scheduleanyway-demo-helper; kubectl delete pods -l app=topology-spread-constraints-scheduleanyway-demo and then kubectl get pods -l app=topology-spread-constraints-scheduleanyway-demo -o wide

Clean up the demo by running kubectl delete -f pod-spread.

Pod Disruption Budget Demo

This demo showcases how you can protect against having too many pods evicted at once during planned node maintenance by defining a PodDisruptionBudget (PDB) for your Pods. It assumes two-node cluster, since one node will be drained during the demo, and having too many nodes would spread the pods too far to show the effect of the PDB. Before the demo, setup the deployment and PDB:

kubectl apply -f pod-disruption-budgets/

After the pods of the deployment have been scheduled, pick a node with a few pods on them, that will be used for the "maintenance" e.g. by running kubectl get pods -l app=pdb-demo -o wide and looking at the Node column and insert it into $NODE in the demo. To then showcase the behavior of the PDB, set up a watch in one terminal using:

watch -n 0.1 kubectl get po-l app=pdb-demo

In a second terminal, cordon and drain the node using

kubectl cordon $NODE
kubectl drain $NODE --ignore-daemonsets

Then jump back to the first terminal with the watch. You should observe, that only one pod is evicted at a time. In the second terminal you can see in the output of kubectl drain, that some errors appear indicating that the demo pods cannot be evicted due to the PDB. After finishing the demo, make sure to clean up by runnning kubectl uncordon $NODE and kubectl delete -f pod-disruption-budgets/.

Showing where the certificate authentication module extracts user-info from

(Only works when authenticating with a client-certificate)

Extract the certificate from your kubeconfig (assumes only one user to exist):

kubectl config view -o jsonpath='{.users[0].user.client-certificate-data}' --raw | base64 -d > cert.pem

Then use openssl x509 -in cert.pem -noout -text | less to show the certificate data. Showcase the Subject where the username and -group are extracted from the Organization (O) and Common Name (CN) field respectively.

About

Demos für various topics of the LFD458 (Kubernetes for Administrators) and LFS459 (Kubernetes for Application Developers) courses by the Linux Foundation.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages