Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed Material signature Rule. #48

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rozim
Copy link

@rozim rozim commented Dec 3, 2017

This is a side effect of my query here:
#47 (comment)

I wanted to search for a certain pattern (2 Queens vs Q + RR) and it seemed that
the existing rules couldn't do it.

I have done some ad hoc testing of this and it seems to work.

In retrospect possibly the existing "material" rule should be updated instead of a new
rule being added.

For a proper pull I probably need to update the test code - but I've put this together
so it's a kind of working proposal.

I don't use git(hub) much so please bear with me if I'm not following some convention.

thx,
Dave

Obscure historical note: ages ago I was watching a post mortem at a chess tournament, maybe
a game between 2 masters, and in their analysis there was a position with 2 queens vs
Q+RR and GM Anthony Lein was watching, and they asked him how to evaluate it, and
he said that QQ was usually much better - and ever since Larry Kaufmann wrote those articles
about statistically evaluating material imbalances I've wanted to do it for this probably
rare situation.

rozim added 2 commits December 2, 2017 20:25
e.g QQ vs Q+RR. My understanding is that "material" and
"material-imbalance" don't do this.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants