feat: Support disabling legacy include preprocessor directives
#458
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ExE-Boss
changed the title
include preprocessor directivesinclude preprocessor directives
This was referenced Nov 22, 2019
Merged
This was referenced Jan 23, 2020
This was referenced Feb 1, 2020
This was referenced Feb 23, 2020
This was referenced Mar 17, 2020
This was referenced Mar 28, 2020
This was referenced Apr 9, 2020
This was referenced Jun 4, 2024
This was referenced Sep 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
KumaScript and other modern EJS‑using projects doesn’t need this, so it just slows down template compilation time where the EJS compiler tries to find
includedirectives.