Update using JSON modules loading of package.json #797
Conversation
Co-authored-by: camcam-lemon <omega.camcamlemon@gmail.com>
camcam-lemon
changed the title
| @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ | |||
| "puppeteer": "^23" | |||
| }, | |||
| "devDependencies": { | |||
| "@babel/core": "^7.26.0", | |||
| "@babel/eslint-parser": "^7.25.9", | |||
| "@babel/plugin-syntax-import-attributes": "^7.26.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Babel is required to run the following
- standard
- @babel/core
- @babel/eslint-parser
- jest
- @babel/plugin-syntax-import-attributes
|
The test is failing・・・ |
| @@ -5,11 +5,8 @@ import { resolve } from 'import-meta-resolve' | |||
| import path from 'path' | |||
| import puppeteer from 'puppeteer' | |||
| import url from 'url' | |||
| import pkg from '../package.json' with { type: 'json' } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh no! I'm really sorry, but it looks like @mermaid-js/mermaid-cli supports Node.JS v18.19, but only Node.JS v18.20 added support for with { type: 'json' }. Previously, it was assert { type: 'json' }!
See https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v18.20.0
Unfortunately, since dropping support for Node.JS v18.19 would be a breaking change, we won't be able to merge this PR until we are ready to release @mermaid-js/mermaid-cli v12, which might be a while!
Maybe as an alternative to fix #796, could we instead just avoid loading package.json?
Maybe we can make a new file like src/version.js that just consists of:
export const version = '11.4.0';And we can make a npm version script that just automatically creates this file and adds it to git using git add, to make sure it's kept in sync with the package.json file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh...
No, I should be the one apologizing.
I should have verified more thoroughly about the Node.js feature release.
Maybe as an alternative to fix #796, could we instead just avoid loading package.json?
Maybe we can make a new file like src/version.js that just consists of:
That's cool!!
You're absolutely right!
I agree with that idea as well!
This task will discard all the current PR's changes, so I will create a separate PR for this work!
When releasing, the package version is referenced as env.RELEASE_VERSION within the github actions, so I plan to try using this variable.
It seems that it can also be referenced using package.json vars, but I believe it's better to refer to the value from the github actions.
I think that accessing it from two different contexts could potentially lead to bugs in the future.
See: https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid-cli/blob/master/.github/workflows/release-publish.yml
See: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v9/using-npm/scripts#packagejson-vars
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I replaced PR #798 .
Once you confirm my comment, I will close this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚀
I should have verified more thoroughly about the Node.js feature release.
Nah, it's my fault too! I even looked at the https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v18.x/api/esm.html#import-specifiers page and it seemed fine! But I should have also looked at the https://nodejs.org/docs/v18.19.0/api/esm.html#import-specifiers page too 😅
This task will discard all the current PR's changes, so I will create a separate PR for this work!
Sounds perfect to me! Your PR #798 looks great to me!
I have spotted a bug in it, but I've got a potential fix in #798 (comment) that should solve it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for everything!
I also checked comments.
Let's close this PR and continue in #798 .
📑 Summary
The loading of package.json has been updated to JSON modules.
Additionally, the setup of Babel has been configured to allow standard and jest to interpret JSON modules.
Resolves #796
📋 Tasks
Make sure you
masterbranch