Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve marketplace mesg.yml definition #863

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 19, 2019

Conversation

NicolasMahe
Copy link
Member

@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe commented Apr 9, 2019

Better to check commit by commit.

Modifs:

  • remove empty name: "" and description: "" (will add them back with content later).
  • Use definition of manifestServiceData in preparePublishServiceVersion
  • Add a basic full definition of service definition

@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2019 11:02
@antho1404
Copy link
Member

Any reason why the "configuration" is not part of the mesg.yml or is it just something you forgot ?
configuration has been extracted from dependencies

@NicolasMahe
Copy link
Member Author

Any reason why the "configuration" is not part of the mesg.yml or is it just something you forgot ?
configuration has been extracted from dependencies

Nice catch. This PR has been done before the extraction of configuration ;)

@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe requested a review from ilgooz April 17, 2019 10:34
type: Boolean
optional: true
object:
type: Object
Copy link
Contributor

@ilgooz ilgooz Apr 18, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could have typed Parameter here as well if we implemented this feature https://forum.mesg.com/t/service-definition-support-recursive-types/260

@antho1404 antho1404 merged commit 13b856f into dev Apr 19, 2019
@antho1404 antho1404 deleted the ss/marketplace-better-object-def branch April 19, 2019 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants