Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for marcxml in test cases #229

Closed
cboehme opened this issue Apr 26, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

Add support for marcxml in test cases #229

cboehme opened this issue Apr 26, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
Enhancement Framework
Milestone
Version 3.1.0

Comments

@cboehme
Copy link
Member

cboehme commented Apr 26, 2015

Marcxml should be supported as input and result format in formeta test cases.
@cboehme cboehme added this to the Version 3.1.0 milestone Apr 26, 2015
blackwinter added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@blackwinter @dr0i
Clean up formatting for SKOS lookup tests. (#229)
5dea28e
blackwinter added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@blackwinter
Drop special treatment of RDF maps in lookup(). (#229)
0987eb0 
metafacture/metafacture-fix#229 (comment)
blackwinter added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@blackwinter
Drop special treatment of map name in put_rdfmap(). (#229)
dc9e63d 
metafacture/metafacture-fix#229 (comment)
blackwinter added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@blackwinter
Unify URI identification logic for RDF maps. (#229)
897c21d
blackwinter added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@blackwinter
A little cleanup. (#229)
7da6541
blackwinter pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@dr0i
Merge #229 from branch 'WIP-metafacture-core-415-addSkosLookup' of ht…
b5b8cc9 
…tps://github.com/metafacture/metafacture-fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement Framework
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 3.1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cboehme