doc: add TypeScript execution requirements

Add section with high level approach/requirements for
enabling TypeScript execution as discussed in the Next-10
[TypeScript mini-summit](nodejs/next-10#150)

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>

doc/contributing/maintaining-types-for-nodejs.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ code of their JavaScript projects. While many people don't annotate their code,
 or make use of annotations at all, there are enough who do that the project has
 agreed it's important to work towards having [suitable types for end-users][].
 
-## High level approach
+## High level approach - maintaining types
 
 There are a number of ways that types could be maintained for Node.js ranging
 from shipping them with the Node.js runtime to having them be externally
@@ -28,6 +28,54 @@ The agreement was that the ideal flow would be as follows:
 * Automation within external type projects consumes the JSON and automatically
   generates a PR to add the API.
 
+## High level approach - development workflow
+
+The number of people using TypeScript with Node.js is significant enough
+that providing a good developer experience is important. While TypeScript
+is identified specifically, a secondary goal is that what we provide to improve
+development experience with TypeScrtipt would apply to other type
+systems as well.
+
+We have agreed that the approach will `NOT` include bundling TypeScript
+tools with Node.js but instead improve the developer experience for how
+those tools are installed/configured to work with Node.js.
+
+The high level developer experience we are working towards was captured in the
+[next-10 TypeScript mini-summit](https://github.com/nodejs/next-10/pull/150)
+and is as follows:
+
+1. Users can ask Node.js to execute a file which is not one of the types it
+   can execute by default (.js, .mjs, etc.). For example `node script.ts`.
+2. On startup Node.js will look for a config which is in the scope of the
+   file being executed.
+3. If no config is found, Node.js will echo either:
+   * If the file was a TypeScript file, a TypeScript specific message with a
+     reference to a link on Nodejs.org on how to install required components
+     for TypeScript and how to add the associated config.
+   * If the file was not a TypeScript file, a generic message
+4. If a config is found, Node.js will extract the Node.js options for
+   that config and apply them as if they had been provided on the command
+   line.
+5. Assuming the options associated with the config add support for the
+   type of file being loaded, Node.js will execute the file as if it was one
+   of the file types it can execute by default.
+
+Some additional specifics around the current thinking include:
+
+* loaders already provide a number of the components needed to
+  satisfy the requirements above. They already provide the Node.js
+  options that are needed to achieve many of the requirements above.
+* package.json as the location for the config is potentially a good
+  choice as Node.js already looks for it as part of startup.
+* The implementation chosen should allow for difference configuration in
+  for different enronments/conditions like prod,dev, etc.
+* We don't have consensus on provding an opinionated default but
+  that should be explored after the initial steps are complete.
+* It will be important that as part of the messaging around this
+  functionality that we avoid confusion that could lead people to ship
+  TypeScript files (ex `script.ts`) instead of the processed files
+  (ex `script.js`).
+
 ## Generation/Consumption of machine readable JSON files
 
 When you run `make doc` the canonical markdown files used to