Revise the runtime code we provide to users for configurability

[benbrown]

This is a draft ticket the requirements for this work are being gathered right now.

We need to make sure the runtime code we provide to users during the eject process (#2470) as well as when we deploy a bot in its unmodified form is well designed for configurability and extension.

Some major behaviors should be configuration driven:

• location of declarative assets
• state storage type
• TelementryloggerMiddleware (feat: [draft] add TelemetryLoggerMiddleware to runtime #2423)
• [Dong] ShowTypingMiddleware (We need to be able to tell the user that we are busy with SendActivity of type "typing" #1781 )
• [Dong] InspectionMiddleware (Inspection Middleware disabled ? #2410)
• set up to work from a sub-folder of a bot project
• TranscriptLoggerMiddleware
• some channel related configures such as Direct Line App Service Extension(Do composer bots support interaction through Direct Line App Service Extension? #2240 ), Direct Speech Channel(Support directlinespeech #1638)...

We will need to make sure that, when deployed, the runtime will still be able to find the assets, and those assets will be in a logical location.

MORE TBD

[boydc2014]

@benbrown added two examples of middle-wares and @luhan2017 may have more options

[luhan2017]

#2423 this PR is to enable a telemetry middleware in botproject.

[luhan2017]

@benbrown, are you working on this right now? @zidaneymar in my team is working on some issues relates to middleware and some specific channel configurations. He probably can resolve most of the items in this list.

[benbrown]

@luhan2017 I am not actively working on the code - I was just trying to gather requirements for the next revision of the code, particularly as it relates to the new "eject" feature described in #2470

[luhan2017]

@luhan2017 I am not actively working on the code - I was just trying to gather requirements for the next revision of the code, particularly as it relates to the new "eject" feature described in #2470

OK, then I will ask @zidaneymar to work on this, and we can discuss more details if needed.

[InnoraG]

This draft would bring great enhancement.
Please look for adapters as well if possible : https://github.com/microsoft/botbuilder-dotnet/tree/master/libraries/Adapters

[carlosscastro]

Hello @luhan2017 ! I'm doing some refactors on bot project and integration with other potential deployment avenues such as azure Functions down the road. Do you have a branch where you folks are working?

[cwhitten]

@luhan2017 please address the following security issues as part of this work:

Critical

https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2301093?typeId=1031785

Medium Priority

https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2226216?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2301078?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/1967473?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/1967474?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2301091?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2301092?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/1702087?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2571210?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/1605678?typeId=1031785
https://fuselabs.visualstudio.com/Composer/_componentGovernance/115206/alert/2656470?typeId=1031785

cc @carlosscastro @benbrown @srinaath

[cwhitten]

addressed via #2679